Celeron 5205U vs E1-2100

Celeron 5205U vs E1-2100 Performance Spectrum

Celeron 5205U

2 / 2

1,432

0.0%

1,435

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 5205U vs E1-2100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 5205U vs E1-2100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 5205U

2019

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics (Comet Lake), while E1-2100 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,432 vs 1,435).
❌66.7% higher power demand at 15W vs 9W.

E1-2100

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 9W instead of 15W, a 6W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 5205U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is E1-2100 better than Celeron 5205U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron 5205U is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, E1-2100 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E1-2100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E1-2100 still makes the most sense overall. E1-2100 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 5205U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 5205U vs E1-2100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 5205U

The Celeron 5205U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,432 points. Launch price was $107.

E1-2100

The E1-2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,435 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 5205U and E1-2100 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Celeron 5205U versus 1 GHz on the E1-2100 — a 62.1% clock advantage for the Celeron 5205U. The Celeron 5205U uses the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the E1-2100 uses Kabini (2013−2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 5205U scores 1,432 against the E1-2100's 1,435 — a 0.2% lead for the E1-2100. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 5205U vs 0 kB on the E1-2100.

Feature	Celeron 5205U	E1-2100
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.9 GHz+90%	1 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1024 kB
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-U (2019−2020)	Kabini (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,432	1,435
Geekbench 6 Single	385	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	650	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 5205U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the E1-2100 uses FT3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 5205U	E1-2100
Socket	FCBGA1528	FT3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 5205U) / not specified (E1-2100). The Celeron 5205U includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (Comet Lake)), while the E1-2100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 5205U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 5205U rivals Pentium Gold 6405U.