Celeron 5205U vs Pentium M 740

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 5205U vs Pentium M 740 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 5205U vs Pentium M 740: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 5205U

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 27W, a 12W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics (Comet Lake), while Pentium M 740 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,432 vs 1,435).

Pentium M 740

2005

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌80% higher power demand at 27W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 5205U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 5205U better than Pentium M 740?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron 5205U is ahead with a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 740 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 740 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 5205U still makes the most sense overall. Celeron 5205U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 5205U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2005). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 5205U vs Pentium M 740 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 5205U

The Celeron 5205U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,432 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium M 740

The Pentium M 740 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.73 GHz, with boost up to 1.73 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,435 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 5205U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium M 740 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron 5205U has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Celeron 5205U versus 1.73 GHz on the Pentium M 740 — a 9.4% clock advantage for the Celeron 5205U (base: 1.9 GHz vs 1.73 GHz). The Celeron 5205U uses the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium M 740 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 5205U scores 1,432 against the Pentium M 740's 1,435 — a 0.2% lead for the Pentium M 740. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 5205U vs 0 kB on the Pentium M 740.

Feature	Celeron 5205U	Pentium M 740
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.9 GHz+10%	1.73 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz+10%	1.73 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Process	14 nm-84%	90 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-U (2019−2020)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	1,432	1,435
Geekbench 6 Single	385	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	650	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 5205U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium M 740 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 5205U	Pentium M 740
Socket	FCBGA1528	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 5205U) / not specified (Pentium M 740). The Celeron 5205U includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (Comet Lake)), while the Pentium M 740 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 5205U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 5205U rivals Pentium Gold 6405U.