Celeron 5205U
VS
Pentium G2020T

Celeron 5205U vs Pentium G2020T

Intel

Celeron 5205U

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Pentium G2020T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 5205U is positioned at rank 1231 and the Pentium G2020T is on rank 741, so the Pentium G2020T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 5205U

#1218
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
8811%
#1219
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
8682%
#1220
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
7970%
#1221
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
7934%
#1222
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
7861%
#1224
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
7592%
#1225
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
7279%
#1226
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
7267%
#1227
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
7072%
#1230
Core i7-820QM
MSRP: $546|Avg: N/A
100%
#1231
Celeron 5205U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1232
Core Duo T2700
MSRP: $663|Avg: N/A
84%
#1234
Pentium SU4100
MSRP: $289|Avg: $15
71%
#1235
Core Solo T1400
MSRP: $200|Avg: $5
64%
#1236
Core i7-940XM
MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A
62%
#1237
Core Solo T1350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $70
61%
#1239
Core Solo T1300
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
55%
#1240
Core Solo T1200
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
51%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G2020T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
13953%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
13184%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9573%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2884%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2284%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1998%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1145%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1130%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1029%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1028%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1017%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
990%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
976%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
972%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
963%
#288
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
99%
#392
Celeron G4920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $115
99%
#740
FX-6100
MSRP: $165|Avg: $25
100%
#741
Pentium G2020T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $69
100%
#742
Core i7-4771
MSRP: $320|Avg: $78
100%
#745
Core i7-4770S
MSRP: $305|Avg: $35
99%
#746
Core i5-6400T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $40
99%
#748
Core i5-3570K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
99%
#749
Athlon II X3 455
MSRP: $88|Avg: $15
99%
#750
Core i5-3570S
MSRP: $213|Avg: $59
98%
#751
Core i7-3770
MSRP: $294|Avg: $60
98%
#752
Pentium G2120
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
98%
#753
Core i5-3340S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $25
97%
#754
Celeron G1101
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
97%
#755
FX-8150
MSRP: $245|Avg: $50
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron 5205U (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron 5205UPentium G2020T
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($69)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium G2020T (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron 5205UPentium G2020T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($69)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 5205U and Pentium G2020T

Intel

Celeron 5205U

The Celeron 5205U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,432 points. Launch price was $107.

Intel

Pentium G2020T

The Pentium G2020T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3072 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,430 points. Launch price was $64.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 5205U and Pentium G2020T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Celeron 5205U versus 2.5 GHz on the Pentium G2020T — a 27.3% clock advantage for the Pentium G2020T (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Celeron 5205U uses the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium G2020T uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 5205U scores 1,432 against the Pentium G2020T's 1,430 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron 5205U. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 5205U vs 3072 kB (total) on the Pentium G2020T.

FeatureCeleron 5205UPentium G2020T
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.9 GHz
2.5 GHz+32%
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
2.5 GHz+32%
L3 Cache
2 MB
3072 kB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Comet Lake-U (2019−2020)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,432
1,430
Geekbench 6 Single
385
Geekbench 6 Multi
650
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 5205U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G2020T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 5205UPentium G2020T
Socket
FCBGA1528
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 5205U) / not specified (Pentium G2020T). The Celeron 5205U includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (Comet Lake)), while the Pentium G2020T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 5205U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 5205U rivals Pentium Gold 6405U.

FeatureCeleron 5205UPentium G2020T
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics (Comet Lake)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget
Celeron 5205U vs Pentium G2020T