Celeron 5205U vs Pentium G2020T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 5205U vs Pentium G2020T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 5205U vs Pentium G2020T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 5205U

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics (Comet Lake), while Pentium G2020T needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).

Pentium G2020T

2013

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,430 vs 1,432).
❌Launch MSRP is still $64 MSRP, while Celeron 5205U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 5205U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 5205U better than Pentium G2020T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium G2020T is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 5205U pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Pentium G2020T also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 5205U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 5205U is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron 5205U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $64 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. Pentium G2020T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (22.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 5205U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 5205U vs Pentium G2020T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 5205U

The Celeron 5205U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,432 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium G2020T

The Pentium G2020T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3072 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,430 points. Launch price was $64.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 5205U and Pentium G2020T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Celeron 5205U versus 2.5 GHz on the Pentium G2020T — a 27.3% clock advantage for the Pentium G2020T (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Celeron 5205U uses the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium G2020T uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 5205U scores 1,432 against the Pentium G2020T's 1,430 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron 5205U. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 5205U vs 3072 kB (total) on the Pentium G2020T.

Feature	Celeron 5205U	Pentium G2020T
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.9 GHz	2.5 GHz+32%
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	2.5 GHz+32%
L3 Cache	2 MB	3072 kB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-U (2019−2020)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	1,432	1,430
Geekbench 6 Single	385	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	650	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 5205U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G2020T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 5205U	Pentium G2020T
Socket	FCBGA1528	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 5205U) / not specified (Pentium G2020T). The Celeron 5205U includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (Comet Lake)), while the Pentium G2020T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 5205U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 5205U rivals Pentium Gold 6405U.