Celeron 5205U vs Pentium J3710

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 5205U vs Pentium J3710 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 5205U vs Pentium J3710: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 5205U

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics (Comet Lake), while Pentium J3710 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌130.8% higher power demand at 15W vs 6.5W.

Pentium J3710

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 7W instead of 15W, a 9W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,420 vs 1,432).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 5205U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 5205U better than Pentium J3710?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium J3710 is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 37 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 5205U pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 5205U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 5205U still makes the most sense overall. Celeron 5205U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 5205U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 5205U vs Pentium J3710 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 5205U

The Celeron 5205U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,432 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium J3710

The Pentium J3710 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.64 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,420 points. Launch price was $161.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 5205U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium J3710 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium J3710 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Celeron 5205U versus 2.64 GHz on the Pentium J3710 — a 32.6% clock advantage for the Pentium J3710 (base: 1.9 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Celeron 5205U uses the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium J3710 uses Airmont (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 5205U scores 1,432 against the Pentium J3710's 1,420 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron 5205U. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 5205U vs 0 kB on the Pentium J3710.

Feature	Celeron 5205U	Pentium J3710
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	1.9 GHz	2.64 GHz+39%
Base Clock	1.9 GHz+19%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-U (2019−2020)	Airmont (2016)
PassMark	1,432	1,420
Geekbench 6 Single	385	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	650	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 5205U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium J3710 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 5205U	Pentium J3710
Socket	FCBGA1528	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 5205U) / not specified (Pentium J3710). The Celeron 5205U includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (Comet Lake)), while the Pentium J3710 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 5205U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 5205U rivals Pentium Gold 6405U.