Celeron 6305 vs Core i7-610E

Intel

Celeron 6305

2 Cores2 Thrd2.5 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2020
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-610E

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

Celeron 6305 vs Core i7-610E Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 6305 vs Core i7-610E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 6305 vs Core i7-610E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 6305

2020

Why buy it

  • +0.3% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $143 less on MSRP ($107 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • Delivers 134.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.4 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • Draws 3W instead of 35W, a 33W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i7-610E

2010

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (2,071 vs 2,077).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 19.4 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
    • 1300% higher power demand at 35W vs 2.5W.
    • No integrated graphics, while Celeron 6305 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Celeron 6305 better than Core i7-610E?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-610E is ahead with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 6305 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 6305 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Celeron 6305 is the better buy right now. Celeron 6305 comes in $143 cheaper on MSRP at $107 MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-610E is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 134.3% better value on MSRP (19.4 vs 8.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Celeron 6305 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Celeron 6305 vs Core i7-610E Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Celeron 6305

    The Celeron 6305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 2.5 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,077 points. Launch price was $69.

    Intel

    Core i7-610E

    The Core i7-610E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 2,071 points. Launch price was $332.

    Processing Power

    The Celeron 6305 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-610E's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 6305 versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-610E — a 56% clock advantage for the Core i7-610E. The Celeron 6305 uses the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Core i7-610E uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 6305 scores 2,077 against the Core i7-610E's 2,071 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron 6305. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron 6305 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-610E.

    FeatureCeleron 6305Core i7-610E
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    2 / 4
    Boost Clock
    1.8 GHz
    3.2 GHz+78%
    Base Clock
    2.53 GHz
    L3 Cache
    4 MB
    4 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    2.5 MB+900%
    256 kB (per core)
    Process
    10 nm SuperFin-69%
    32 nm
    Architecture
    Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021)
    Arrandale (2010−2011)
    PassMark
    2,077
    2,071
    Geekbench 6 Single
    744
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    1,236
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Celeron 6305 uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-610E uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCeleron 6305Core i7-610E
    Socket
    FCBGA1449
    BGA1288
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 4.0+100%
    PCIe 2.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR4-3200
    Max RAM Capacity
    64 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    4
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 6305) / not specified (Core i7-610E). The Celeron 6305 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 11th Gen), while the Core i7-610E requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 6305 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 6305 rivals Pentium Gold 7505.

    FeatureCeleron 6305Core i7-610E
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    UHD Graphics for 11th Gen
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d
    Target Use
    Budget
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Celeron 6305 was priced at $107, while the Core i7-610E came in at $250. On launch pricing ($107 vs $250), Celeron 6305 was $143 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 6305 delivers 19.4 pts/$ vs 8.3 pts/$ for the Core i7-610E — making the Celeron 6305 the 80.4% better value option.

    FeatureCeleron 6305Core i7-610E
    MSRP
    $107-57%
    $250
    Performance per Dollar
    19.4+134%
    8.3
    Release Date
    2020
    2010

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.