
Celeron 6305

Core i7-610E
Celeron 6305 vs Core i7-610E Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron 6305 vs Core i7-610E FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron 6305 vs Core i7-610E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron 6305
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $143 less on MSRP ($107 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 134.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.4 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 3W instead of 35W, a 33W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i7-610E
2010Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,071 vs 2,077).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 19.4 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
- ❌1300% higher power demand at 35W vs 2.5W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 6305 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron 6305 better than Core i7-610E?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 6305 vs Core i7-610E Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 6305
The Celeron 6305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 2.5 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,077 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i7-610E
The Core i7-610E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 2,071 points. Launch price was $332.
Processing Power
The Celeron 6305 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-610E's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 6305 versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-610E — a 56% clock advantage for the Core i7-610E. The Celeron 6305 uses the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Core i7-610E uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 6305 scores 2,077 against the Core i7-610E's 2,071 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron 6305. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron 6305 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-610E.
| Feature | Celeron 6305 | Core i7-610E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz | 3.2 GHz+78% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.53 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB+900% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin-69% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,077 | 2,071 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 744 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,236 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 6305 uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-610E uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron 6305 | Core i7-610E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1449 | BGA1288 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+100% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 6305) / not specified (Core i7-610E). The Celeron 6305 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 11th Gen), while the Core i7-610E requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 6305 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 6305 rivals Pentium Gold 7505.
| Feature | Celeron 6305 | Core i7-610E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics for 11th Gen | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron 6305 was priced at $107, while the Core i7-610E came in at $250. On launch pricing ($107 vs $250), Celeron 6305 was $143 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 6305 delivers 19.4 pts/$ vs 8.3 pts/$ for the Core i7-610E — making the Celeron 6305 the 80.4% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 6305 | Core i7-610E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $107-57% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.4+134% | 8.3 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














