
Celeron 6305 vs Pentium G2140

Celeron 6305

Pentium G2140
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 6305 is positioned at rank 897 and the Pentium G2140 is on rank 775, so the Pentium G2140 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 6305
Performance Per Dollar Pentium G2140
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron 6305 | Pentium G2140 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($80) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($95) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) / 10 nm SuperFin) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron 6305 | Pentium G2140 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+18%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($80) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($95) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 6305 and Pentium G2140

Celeron 6305
The Celeron 6305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 2.5 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,077 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium G2140
The Pentium G2140 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,092 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron 6305 and Pentium G2140 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Celeron 6305 is built on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 6305 scores 2,077 against the Pentium G2140's 2,092 — a 0.7% lead for the Pentium G2140. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 744 vs 550, a 30% lead for the Celeron 6305 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,236 vs 920 (29.3% advantage for the Celeron 6305). L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron 6305 vs 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Pentium G2140.
| Feature | Celeron 6305 | Pentium G2140 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | — | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB | — |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin-55% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) | — |
| PassMark | 2,077 | 2,092 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 744+35% | 550 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,236+34% | 920 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 6305 uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Pentium G2140 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Celeron 6305 versus DDR3-1600 on the Pentium G2140 — the Celeron 6305 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 6305 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron 6305) vs 16 (Pentium G2140) — the Pentium G2140 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Tiger Lake-U (Celeron 6305) and H61,B75 (Pentium G2140).
| Feature | Celeron 6305 | Pentium G2140 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1449 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+33% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+100% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 16+300% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 6305) vs VT-x (Pentium G2140). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (Celeron 6305) and Intel HD Graphics (Pentium G2140) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 6305 targets Budget, Pentium G2140 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron 6305 rivals Pentium Gold 7505.
| Feature | Celeron 6305 | Pentium G2140 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics for 11th Gen | Intel HD Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x |
| Target Use | Budget | Legacy Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Celeron 6305 launched at $107 MSRP, while the Pentium G2140 debuted at $100. At current prices ($80 vs $95), the Celeron 6305 is $15 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 6305 delivers 26.0 pts/$ vs 22.0 pts/$ for the Pentium G2140 — making the Celeron 6305 the 16.4% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 6305 | Pentium G2140 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $107 | $100-7% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80-16% | $95 |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.0+18% | 22.0 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















