Celeron 6305 vs Phenom II X4 830

Celeron 6305 vs Phenom II X4 830 Performance Spectrum

Celeron 6305

2 / 2

2,077

+0.2%

2,072

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 6305 vs Phenom II X4 830 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 6305 vs Phenom II X4 830: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 6305

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 3W instead of 95W, a 93W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics for 11th Gen, while Phenom II X4 830 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $107 MSRP, while Phenom II X4 830 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Phenom II X4 830

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,072 vs 2,077).
❌3700% higher power demand at 95W vs 2.5W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 6305 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 6305 better than Phenom II X4 830?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Phenom II X4 830 is ahead with a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 6305 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 6305 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 6305 is the better buy right now. Celeron 6305 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $107 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Phenom II X4 830 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (19.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 6305 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 6305 vs Phenom II X4 830 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 6305

The Celeron 6305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 2.5 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,077 points. Launch price was $69.

Phenom II X4 830

The Phenom II X4 830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,072 points. Launch price was $80.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 6305 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom II X4 830 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 830 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 6305 versus 2.8 GHz on the Phenom II X4 830 — a 43.5% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 830. The Celeron 6305 uses the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Phenom II X4 830 uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 6305 scores 2,077 against the Phenom II X4 830's 2,072 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron 6305. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron 6305 vs 4 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 830.

Feature	Celeron 6305	Phenom II X4 830
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2.8 GHz+56%
Base Clock	—	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2.5 MB+400%	512 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm SuperFin-78%	45 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021)	Deneb (2009−2011)
PassMark	2,077	2,072
Geekbench 6 Single	744	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,236	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 6305 uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Phenom II X4 830 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 6305	Phenom II X4 830
Socket	FCBGA1449	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+100%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 6305) / not specified (Phenom II X4 830). The Celeron 6305 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 11th Gen), while the Phenom II X4 830 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 6305 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 6305 rivals Pentium Gold 7505.