PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 6305 vs Pentium G3258 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 6305 vs Pentium G3258: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 6305

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 3W instead of 54W, a 52W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.4 vs 27.5 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).

Pentium G3258

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $32 less on MSRP ($75 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
✅Delivers 41.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.5 vs 19.4 PassMark/$ ($75 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,063 vs 2,077).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌2060% higher power demand at 54W vs 2.5W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 6305 better than Pentium G3258?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium G3258 is ahead with 77.8% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 6305 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. Celeron 6305 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 6305 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 6305 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron 6305 comes in 42.7% more expensive on MSRP at $107 MSRP versus $75 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. Pentium G3258 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 41.7% better value on paper (27.5 vs 19.4 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 6305 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2014), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 6305 vs Pentium G3258 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 6305

The Celeron 6305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 2.5 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,077 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium G3258

The Pentium G3258 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,063 points. Launch price was $77.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 6305 and Pentium G3258 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 6305 versus 3.2 GHz on the Pentium G3258 — a 56% clock advantage for the Pentium G3258. The Celeron 6305 uses the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Pentium G3258 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 6305 scores 2,077 against the Pentium G3258's 2,063 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron 6305. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron 6305 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G3258.

Feature	Celeron 6305	Pentium G3258
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	3.2 GHz+78%
Base Clock	—	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB+33%	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2.5 MB+900%	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm SuperFin-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,077	2,063
Geekbench 6 Single	744	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,236	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 6305 uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Pentium G3258 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Celeron 6305 versus DDR3-1333 on the Pentium G3258 — the Celeron 6305 supports 140.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 6305 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron 6305) vs 16 (Pentium G3258) — the Pentium G3258 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Celeron 6305	Pentium G3258
Socket	FCBGA1449	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200+140%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Pentium G3258 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 6305) vs VT-x (Pentium G3258). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (Celeron 6305) and HD Graphics (Pentium G3258) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 6305 targets Budget, Pentium G3258 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron 6305 rivals Pentium Gold 7505.

Feature	Celeron 6305	Pentium G3258
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics for 11th Gen	HD Graphics
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 6305 was priced at $107, while the Pentium G3258 came in at $75. On launch pricing ($107 vs $75), Pentium G3258 was $32 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 6305 delivers 19.4 pts/$ vs 27.5 pts/$ for the Pentium G3258 — making the Pentium G3258 the 34.5% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 6305	Pentium G3258
MSRP	$107	$75-30%
Performance per Dollar	19.4	27.5+42%
Release Date	2020	2014

Search Celeron 6305 on Amazon

Search Pentium G3258 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.