Celeron 887 vs Xeon E5345

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 887 vs Xeon E5345 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 887 vs Xeon E5345: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 887

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 17W instead of 80W, a 63W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Xeon E5345 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5345, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while Xeon E5345 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5345

2006

Why buy it

✅+300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,868 vs 1,877).
❌370.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 17W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 887 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 887 better than Xeon E5345?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5345 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron 887 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 887 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 887 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 887 is the better buy right now. Celeron 887 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $86 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (21.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 887 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 887 vs Xeon E5345 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 887

The Celeron 887 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,877 points. Launch price was $86.

Xeon E5345

The Xeon E5345 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 November 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.33 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,868 points. Launch price was $851.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 887 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon E5345 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5345 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Celeron 887 versus 0.33 GHz on the Xeon E5345 — a 127.9% clock advantage for the Celeron 887 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.33 GHz). The Celeron 887 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5345 uses Clovertown (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 887 scores 1,877 against the Xeon E5345's 1,868 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron 887. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 887 vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5345.

Feature	Celeron 887	Xeon E5345
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	1.5 GHz+355%	0.33 GHz
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	2.33 GHz+55%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	8 MB L2 Cache+300%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+6300%	4 MB (total)
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Clovertown (2006−2007)
PassMark	1,877	1,868
Geekbench 6 Single	233	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	415	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 887 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5345 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 887	Xeon E5345
Socket	BGA1023	LGA771
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 887) / not specified (Xeon E5345). The Celeron 887 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Xeon E5345 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 887 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron 887 rivals Pentium 967.