PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 925 vs Pentium M 760 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 925 vs Pentium M 760: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 925

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Pentium M 760 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌29.6% higher power demand at 35W vs 27W.

Pentium M 760

2005

Why buy it

✅Draws 27W instead of 35W, a 8W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (515 vs 525).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 925 better than Pentium M 760?

Yes. Celeron 925 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 1.9% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 925 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 1.9% stronger overall PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 925 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 925 is the better buy right now. Celeron 925 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $100 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.9% higher PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 925 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2005). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 925 vs Pentium M 760 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 925

The Celeron 925 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium M 760

The Pentium M 760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Pentium M 760 is built on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 925 scores 525 against the Pentium M 760's 515 — a 1.9% lead for the Celeron 925. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 925 vs 0 kB on the Pentium M 760.

Feature	Celeron 925	Pentium M 760
Cores / Threads	—	1 / 1
Boost Clock	—	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz+15%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	1 MB L2 Cache	0 kB
L2 Cache	—	2 MB
Process	45 nm-50%	90 nm
Architecture	—	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	525+2%	515
Geekbench 6 Single	—	240

🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron 925 versus DDR2-533 on the Pentium M 760 — the Celeron 925 supports 150.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 925 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Celeron 925) vs 2 (Pentium M 760). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: GL40,GM45 (Celeron 925) and 915GM,915PM (Pentium M 760).

Feature	Celeron 925	Pentium M 760
Socket	—	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+150%	DDR2-533
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization: No (Celeron 925) / not specified (Pentium M 760). Primary use case: Celeron 925 targets Budget, Pentium M 760 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron 925 rivals Pentium 4 2.80; Pentium M 760 rivals Pentium M 750.