PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 570 vs Celeron 925 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 570 vs Celeron 925: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 570

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 31W instead of 35W, a 4W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (505 vs 525).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 5.3 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Celeron 925

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $34 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
✅Delivers 39.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 5.3 vs 3.8 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 925 better than Celeron 570?

Yes. Celeron 925 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 4% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 925 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 4% stronger overall PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 925 is the stronger fit. You are getting 4% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 925 is the better buy right now. Celeron 925 comes in $34 cheaper on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you 4.0% higher PassMark. It is also 39.3% better value on MSRP (5.3 vs 3.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 925 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2008). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 570 vs Celeron 925 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 570

The Celeron 570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.26 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron 925

The Celeron 925 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

In PassMark, the Celeron 570 scores 505 against the Celeron 925's 525 — a 3.9% lead for the Celeron 925. Both processors carry 1 MB L2 Cache of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron 570	Celeron 925
Base Clock	2.26 GHz	2.3 GHz+2%
L3 Cache	1 MB L2 Cache	1 MB L2 Cache
Process	65 nm	45 nm-31%
PassMark	505	525+4%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Celeron 570 versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron 925 — the Celeron 925 supports 99.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron 570) vs 1 (Celeron 925). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: GL40,GM45 (Celeron 570) and GL40,GM45 (Celeron 925).

Feature	Celeron 570	Celeron 925
Socket	PGA478	—
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-667	DDR3-1333+100%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support No virtualization. Primary use case: Celeron 570 targets Budget, Celeron 925 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 570 rivals Pentium T2310; Celeron 925 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.

Feature	Celeron 570	Celeron 925
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	No	No
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 570 was priced at $134, while the Celeron 925 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($134 vs $100), Celeron 925 was $34 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 570 delivers 3.8 pts/$ vs 5.3 pts/$ for the Celeron 925 — making the Celeron 925 the 32.9% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 570	Celeron 925
MSRP	$134	$100-25%
Performance per Dollar	3.8	5.3+39%
Release Date	2008	2011

Search Celeron 570 on Amazon

Search Celeron 925 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.