Athlon 64 3300+ vs Celeron 570

Athlon 64 3300+ vs Celeron 570 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 3300+

1 / 1

522

+3.4%

Athlon XP 2200+

Athlon XP 2600+

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+

Athlon 64 3000+

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron 570

505

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 3300+ vs Celeron 570 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 3300+ vs Celeron 570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 3300+

2004

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Celeron 570.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 3.8 PassMark/$ ($200 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
❌187.1% higher power demand at 89W vs 31W.

Celeron 570

2008

Why buy it

✅Costs $66 less on MSRP ($134 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 44.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 3.8 vs 2.6 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Draws 31W instead of 89W, a 58W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (505 vs 522).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 64 3300+.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 64 3300+ better than Celeron 570?

Yes. Athlon 64 3300+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 3.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon 64 3300+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 3300+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 64 3300+ is still the much better call for a fresh build. Athlon 64 3300+ comes in 49.3% more expensive on MSRP at $200 MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron 570 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 44.4% better value on paper (3.8 vs 2.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 570 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2008 vs 2004). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 64 3300+ vs Celeron 570 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 3300+

The Athlon 64 3300+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the NewCastle (2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 522 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron 570

The Celeron 570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.26 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 3300+ is built on the NewCastle (2004) architecture. In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3300+ scores 522 against the Celeron 570's 505 — a 3.3% lead for the Athlon 64 3300+. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 3300+ vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 570.

Feature	Athlon 64 3300+	Celeron 570
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	—
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	—
Base Clock	—	2.26 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	256 kB	—
Process	130 nm	65 nm-50%
Architecture	NewCastle (2004)	—
PassMark	522+3%	505
Geekbench 6 Single	150	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	150	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 3300+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron 570 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR1-400 on the Athlon 64 3300+ versus DDR2-667 on the Celeron 570 — the Celeron 570 supports 66.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 570 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 3 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Athlon 64 3300+) vs 2 (Celeron 570). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: VIA K8T800,nForce3 (Athlon 64 3300+) and GL40,GM45 (Celeron 570).

Feature	Athlon 64 3300+	Celeron 570
Socket	754	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR1-400	DDR2-667+67%
Max RAM Capacity	3 GB	4 GB+33%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: None (Athlon 64 3300+) vs No (Celeron 570). Primary use case: Athlon 64 3300+ targets Retro Desktop, Celeron 570 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 570 rivals Pentium T2310.

Feature	Athlon 64 3300+	Celeron 570
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	None	No
Target Use	Retro Desktop	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 64 3300+ was priced at $200, while the Celeron 570 came in at $134. On launch pricing ($200 vs $134), Celeron 570 was $66 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 3300+ delivers 2.6 pts/$ vs 3.8 pts/$ for the Celeron 570 — making the Celeron 570 the 36.3% better value option.

Feature	Athlon 64 3300+	Celeron 570
MSRP	$200	$134-33%
Performance per Dollar	2.6	3.8+46%
Release Date	2004	2008

Search Athlon 64 3300+ on Amazon

Search Celeron 570 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.