Athlon 64 3300+ vs Atom D510

Athlon 64 3300+ vs Atom D510 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 3300+

1 / 1

522

0.0%

Athlon XP 2200+

Athlon XP 2600+

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+

Athlon 64 3000+

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Atom D510

2 / 4

525

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 3300+ vs Atom D510 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 3300+ vs Atom D510: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 3300+

2004

Why buy it

✅+15.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Atom D510.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (150 vs 350).
❌Launch MSRP is still $200 MSRP, while Atom D510 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌584.6% higher power demand at 89W vs 13W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom D510 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Atom D510

2009

Why buy it

✅+133.3% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Draws 13W instead of 89W, a 76W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3150, while Athlon 64 3300+ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (130 vs 150).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 64 3300+.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom D510 better than Athlon 64 3300+?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon 64 3300+ is ahead with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom D510 pulls ahead with 133.3% better Geekbench multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom D510 is the stronger fit. You are getting 133.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom D510 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Atom D510 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $200 MSRP, and it still gives you 133.3% better Geekbench multi-core. Athlon 64 3300+ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2004 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (2.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on 754.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom D510 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2004) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 64 3300+ vs Atom D510 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 3300+

The Athlon 64 3300+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the NewCastle (2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 522 points. Launch price was $149.

Atom D510

The Atom D510 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 December 2009 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $97.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 3300+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Atom D510 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom D510 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Athlon 64 3300+ versus 1.67 GHz on the Atom D510 — a 35.9% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 3300+. The Athlon 64 3300+ uses the NewCastle (2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Atom D510 uses Pineview (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3300+ scores 522 against the Atom D510's 525 — a 0.6% lead for the Atom D510. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 150 vs 130, a 14.3% lead for the Athlon 64 3300+ that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 150 vs 350 (80% advantage for the Atom D510). Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon 64 3300+	Atom D510
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+44%	1.67 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.66 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	130 nm	45 nm-65%
Architecture	NewCastle (2004)	Pineview (2009−2011)
PassMark	522	525
Geekbench 6 Single	150+15%	130
Geekbench 6 Multi	150	350+133%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 3300+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Atom D510 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR1-400 on the Athlon 64 3300+ versus DDR2-800 on the Atom D510 — the Atom D510 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom D510 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 3 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 3300+) vs 4 (Atom D510) — the Atom D510 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: VIA K8T800,nForce3 (Athlon 64 3300+) and NM10 (Atom D510).

Feature	Athlon 64 3300+	Atom D510
Socket	754	FCBGA559
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR1-400	DDR2-800+100%
Max RAM Capacity	3 GB	4 GB+33%
RAM Channels	1	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support None virtualization. The Atom D510 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Athlon 64 3300+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 64 3300+ targets Retro Desktop, Atom D510 targets Nettop.