Athlon 64 3300+ vs Opteron 246

AMD

Athlon 64 3300+

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2004
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Opteron 246

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2 GHz2003
Similar parts
·······

Athlon 64 3300+ vs Opteron 246 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 3300+ vs Opteron 246 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 3300+ vs Opteron 246: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 3300+

2004

Why buy it

  • Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Opteron 246.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (522 vs 538).
  • Launch MSRP is still $200 MSRP, while Opteron 246 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Opteron 246

2003

Why buy it

  • +3.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 64 3300+.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 64 3300+ better than Opteron 246?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 246 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Athlon 64 3300+ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 246 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.1% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Athlon 64 3300+ is the better buy right now. Athlon 64 3300+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at $200 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 20% higher max boost clock. The compromise is that Opteron 246 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 3.1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (2.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 64 3300+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2004 vs 2003). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 64 3300+ vs Opteron 246 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon 64 3300+

The Athlon 64 3300+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the NewCastle (2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 522 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Opteron 246

The Opteron 246 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 538 points. Launch price was $109.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 3300+ and Opteron 246 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Athlon 64 3300+ versus 2 GHz on the Opteron 246 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 3300+. The Athlon 64 3300+ uses the NewCastle (2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Opteron 246 uses SledgeHammer (2003−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3300+ scores 522 against the Opteron 246's 538 — a 3% lead for the Opteron 246. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAthlon 64 3300+Opteron 246
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz+20%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB
1 MB+300%
Process
130 nm
130 nm
Architecture
NewCastle (2004)
SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
PassMark
522
538+3%
Geekbench 6 Single
150
Geekbench 6 Multi
150
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 3300+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Opteron 246 uses 940 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon 64 3300+Opteron 246
Socket
754
940
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR1-400
Max RAM Capacity
3 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: None (Athlon 64 3300+) / not specified (Opteron 246). Primary use case: Athlon 64 3300+ targets Retro Desktop.

FeatureAthlon 64 3300+Opteron 246
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
None
Target Use
Retro Desktop