Athlon 64 3300+
VS
Opteron 246

Athlon 64 3300+ vs Opteron 246

AMD

Athlon 64 3300+

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2004
VS
AMD

Opteron 246

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2 GHz2003

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 3300+ is positioned at rank 1097 and the Opteron 246 is on rank 762, so the Opteron 246 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 3300+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
119431%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
112851%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
81939%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
24685%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
19553%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
17105%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
9797%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
9669%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
8804%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
8803%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
8705%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
8470%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
8351%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
8318%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
8242%
#1097
Athlon 64 3300+
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
100%
#1098
Athlon 64 2800+
MSRP: $178|Avg: $15
90%
#1099
Athlon 64 3700+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $20
88%
#1100
Athlon 64 FX-72
MSRP: $799|Avg: $40
86%
#1101
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
MSRP: $581|Avg: $110
83%
#1102
Athlon 64 3500+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $10
80%
#1103
Pentium D 830
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
75%
#1104
Pentium D 960
MSRP: $523|Avg: $15
74%
#1105
Athlon XP 2500+
MSRP: $172|Avg: $15
71%
#1106
Athlon 64 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $10
70%
#1107
Pentium 4 2.53
MSRP: $193|Avg: $13
69%
#1108
Pentium 4 2.40
MSRP: $193|Avg: $193
64%
#1109
Athlon XP 2400+
MSRP: $193|Avg: $10
61%
#1110
Pentium D 950
MSRP: $637|Avg: $10
56%
#1111
Athlon XP 1500+
MSRP: $130|Avg: $15
56%
#1112
Athlon 64 4000+
MSRP: $482|Avg: $30
54%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 246

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
15452%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2917%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2592%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2002%
#439
Xeon Gold 6338
MSRP: $2990|Avg: $1604
100%
#440
Xeon Gold 6538N
MSRP: $3351|Avg: $170
100%
#441
EPYC 7F52
MSRP: $3100|Avg: $1826
99%
#442
EPYC 7542
MSRP: $3400|Avg: $899
99%
#443
EPYC 9655
MSRP: $11852|Avg: $11852
98%
#444
Xeon 6781P
MSRP: $8960|Avg: $8960
98%
#445
Xeon Gold 6338N
MSRP: $3200|Avg: $3200
98%
#446
Xeon Gold 5117
MSRP: $1286|Avg: $300
98%
#447
EPYC 73F3
MSRP: $3521|Avg: $2100
97%
#448
EPYC 9384X
MSRP: $5529|Avg: $4157
97%
#449
EPYC 8534P
MSRP: $5529|Avg: $5529
97%
#762
Opteron 246
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#768
Xeon E3-1270L v4
MSRP: $581|Avg: $636
98%
#771
Xeon E3-1545M v5
MSRP: $581|Avg: $636
98%
#775
Xeon E5-2407 v2
MSRP: $250|Avg: $39
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Athlon 64 3300+ leads in gaming performance. However, the Opteron 246 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAthlon 64 3300+Opteron 246
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (NewCastle (2004) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (SledgeHammer (2003−2005) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAthlon 64 3300+Opteron 246
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 3300+ and Opteron 246

AMD

Athlon 64 3300+

The Athlon 64 3300+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the NewCastle (2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 522 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Opteron 246

The Opteron 246 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 538 points. Launch price was $109.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 3300+ and Opteron 246 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Athlon 64 3300+ versus 2 GHz on the Opteron 246 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 3300+. The Athlon 64 3300+ uses the NewCastle (2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Opteron 246 uses SledgeHammer (2003−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3300+ scores 522 against the Opteron 246's 538 — a 3% lead for the Opteron 246. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAthlon 64 3300+Opteron 246
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz+20%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB
1 MB+300%
Process
130 nm
130 nm
Architecture
NewCastle (2004)
SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
PassMark
522
538+3%
Geekbench 6 Single
150
Geekbench 6 Multi
150
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 3300+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Opteron 246 uses 940 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon 64 3300+Opteron 246
Socket
754
940
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR1-400
Max RAM Capacity
3 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: None (Athlon 64 3300+) / not specified (Opteron 246). Primary use case: Athlon 64 3300+ targets Retro Desktop.

FeatureAthlon 64 3300+Opteron 246
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
None
Target Use
Retro Desktop