Athlon 64 3300+
VS
Xeon 3.06

Athlon 64 3300+ vs Xeon 3.06

AMD

Athlon 64 3300+

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2004
VS
Intel

Xeon 3.06

1 Cores1 Thrd97 WWMax: 3.07 GHz2003

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 3300+ is positioned at rank 1097 and the Xeon 3.06 is on rank 1015, so the Xeon 3.06 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 3300+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
119431%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
112851%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
81939%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
24685%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
19553%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
17105%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
9797%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
9669%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
8804%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
8803%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
8705%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
8470%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
8351%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
8318%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
8242%
#1097
Athlon 64 3300+
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
100%
#1098
Athlon 64 2800+
MSRP: $178|Avg: $15
90%
#1099
Athlon 64 3700+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $20
88%
#1100
Athlon 64 FX-72
MSRP: $799|Avg: $40
86%
#1101
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
MSRP: $581|Avg: $110
83%
#1102
Athlon 64 3500+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $10
80%
#1103
Pentium D 830
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
75%
#1104
Pentium D 960
MSRP: $523|Avg: $15
74%
#1105
Athlon XP 2500+
MSRP: $172|Avg: $15
71%
#1106
Athlon 64 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $10
70%
#1107
Pentium 4 2.53
MSRP: $193|Avg: $13
69%
#1108
Pentium 4 2.40
MSRP: $193|Avg: $193
64%
#1109
Athlon XP 2400+
MSRP: $193|Avg: $10
61%
#1110
Pentium D 950
MSRP: $637|Avg: $10
56%
#1111
Athlon XP 1500+
MSRP: $130|Avg: $15
56%
#1112
Athlon 64 4000+
MSRP: $482|Avg: $30
54%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon 3.06

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
77546%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
14641%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
13008%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
10049%
#541
Xeon E5-4669 v4
MSRP: $7007|Avg: $300
93%
#1015
Xeon 3.06
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1016
Xeon E5-4640
MSRP: $2725|Avg: N/A
96%
#1018
Xeon E5-4650
MSRP: $3616|Avg: $71
89%
#1019
Xeon E5-4650L
MSRP: $3616|Avg: N/A
88%
#1020
Xeon E5-4655 v4
MSRP: $4616|Avg: N/A
88%
#1021
Xeon E-2224
MSRP: $3226|Avg: $195
83%
#1022
Athlon MP 2400+
MSRP: $151|Avg: $20
75%
#1023
Xeon E5-2650L v2
MSRP: $4115|Avg: $1078
69%
#1024
Xeon E5-2640 v2
MSRP: $4115|Avg: $530
69%
#1025
Opteron 142
MSRP: $292|Avg: $20
57%
#1026
Athlon MP 2800+
MSRP: $275|Avg: $10
51%
#1027
Xeon L3110
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $950
50%
#1028
Xeon 2.66
MSRP: $337|Avg: $10
49%
#1029
Xeon X5272
MSRP: $1172|Avg: $76
46%
#1030
Xeon 3.20
MSRP: $851|Avg: $10
25%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon 3.06 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightAthlon 64 3300+Xeon 3.06
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (NewCastle (2004) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Gallatin (2003−2004) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon 64 3300+ ($200), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($200 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightAthlon 64 3300+Xeon 3.06
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 3300+ and Xeon 3.06

AMD

Athlon 64 3300+

The Athlon 64 3300+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the NewCastle (2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 522 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon 3.06

The Xeon 3.06 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Gallatin (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 3.07 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 97 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 535 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 3300+ and Xeon 3.06 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Athlon 64 3300+ versus 3.07 GHz on the Xeon 3.06 — a 24.5% clock advantage for the Xeon 3.06. The Athlon 64 3300+ uses the NewCastle (2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Xeon 3.06 uses Gallatin (2003−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3300+ scores 522 against the Xeon 3.06's 535 — a 2.5% lead for the Xeon 3.06. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 3300+ vs 2 MB on the Xeon 3.06.

FeatureAthlon 64 3300+Xeon 3.06
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
3.07 GHz+28%
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 kB
512 kB+100%
Process
130 nm
130 nm
Architecture
NewCastle (2004)
Gallatin (2003−2004)
PassMark
522
535+2%
Geekbench 6 Single
150
Geekbench 6 Multi
150
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 3300+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Xeon 3.06 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon 64 3300+Xeon 3.06
Socket
754
PGA604
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR1-400
Max RAM Capacity
3 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: None (Athlon 64 3300+) / not specified (Xeon 3.06). Primary use case: Athlon 64 3300+ targets Retro Desktop.

FeatureAthlon 64 3300+Xeon 3.06
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
None
Target Use
Retro Desktop