Athlon 64 3300+ vs Pentium M 760

Athlon 64 3300+ vs Pentium M 760 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 3300+

1 / 1

522

+1.4%

Athlon XP 2200+

Athlon XP 2600+

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+

Athlon 64 3000+

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium M 760

1 / 1

515

0.0%

Atom N280

Pentium M 1.40

Mobile Pentium 4 2.66

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 3300+ vs Pentium M 760 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 3300+ vs Pentium M 760: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 3300+

2004

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Pentium M 760.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (150 vs 240).
❌Launch MSRP is still $200 MSRP, while Pentium M 760 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌229.6% higher power demand at 89W vs 27W.

Pentium M 760

2005

Why buy it

✅+60% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 27W instead of 89W, a 62W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (515 vs 522).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 64 3300+.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium M 760 better than Athlon 64 3300+?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium M 760 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 3300+ pulls ahead with 1.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 3300+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium M 760 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium M 760 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $200 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon 64 3300+ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2004 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (2.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on 754.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium M 760 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2005 vs 2004). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 64 3300+ vs Pentium M 760 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 3300+

The Athlon 64 3300+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the NewCastle (2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 522 points. Launch price was $149.

Pentium M 760

The Pentium M 760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 3300+ and Pentium M 760 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Athlon 64 3300+ versus 2 GHz on the Pentium M 760 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 3300+. The Athlon 64 3300+ uses the NewCastle (2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Pentium M 760 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3300+ scores 522 against the Pentium M 760's 515 — a 1.4% lead for the Athlon 64 3300+. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 150 vs 240, a 46.2% lead for the Pentium M 760 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon 64 3300+	Pentium M 760
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+20%	2 GHz
Base Clock	—	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB	2 MB+700%
Process	130 nm	90 nm-31%
Architecture	NewCastle (2004)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	522+1%	515
Geekbench 6 Single	150	240+60%
Geekbench 6 Multi	150	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 3300+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium M 760 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR1-400 on the Athlon 64 3300+ versus DDR2-533 on the Pentium M 760 — the Pentium M 760 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 64 3300+ supports up to 3 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Athlon 64 3300+) vs 2 (Pentium M 760). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: VIA K8T800,nForce3 (Athlon 64 3300+) and 915GM,915PM (Pentium M 760).

Feature	Athlon 64 3300+	Pentium M 760
Socket	754	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR1-400	DDR2-533+33%
Max RAM Capacity	3 GB+50%	2 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization: None (Athlon 64 3300+) / not specified (Pentium M 760). Primary use case: Athlon 64 3300+ targets Retro Desktop, Pentium M 760 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Pentium M 760 rivals Pentium M 750.