Celeron 570 vs Celeron 807

Intel

Celeron 570

31 WW2008
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Celeron 807

1 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Celeron 570 vs Celeron 807 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 570 vs Celeron 807 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 570 vs Celeron 807: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 570

2008

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (505 vs 535).
    • Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 1.5 MB).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
    • 82.4% higher power demand at 31W vs 17W.
    • No integrated graphics, while Celeron 807 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Celeron 807

    2012

    Why buy it

    • +50% larger total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 1 MB).
    • Costs $64 less on MSRP ($70 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
    • Delivers 102.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 7.6 vs 3.8 PassMark/$ ($70 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
    • Draws 17W instead of 31W, a 14W reduction.
    • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Celeron 570 needs a discrete GPU.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Celeron 807 better than Celeron 570?
    Yes. Celeron 807 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 5.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Celeron 807 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 807 is the stronger fit. You are getting 5.9% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 1 MB).
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Celeron 807 is the better buy right now. Celeron 807 comes in $64 cheaper on MSRP at $70 MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 102.8% better value on MSRP (7.6 vs 3.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Celeron 807 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2008) and 50% larger total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 1 MB). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Celeron 570 vs Celeron 807 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Celeron 570

    The Celeron 570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.26 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.

    Intel

    Celeron 807

    The Celeron 807 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 535 points. Launch price was $70.

    Processing Power

    The Celeron 807 is built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 570 scores 505 against the Celeron 807's 535 — a 5.8% lead for the Celeron 807. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 570 vs 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron 807.

    FeatureCeleron 570Celeron 807
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 2
    Boost Clock
    1.5 GHz
    Base Clock
    2.26 GHz+51%
    1.5 GHz
    L3 Cache
    1 MB L2 Cache
    1.5 MB (total)+50%
    L2 Cache
    256K (per core)
    Process
    65 nm
    32 nm-51%
    Architecture
    Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
    PassMark
    505
    535+6%
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Celeron 570 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 807 uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Celeron 570 versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron 807 — the Celeron 807 supports 99.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 807 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: GL40,GM45 (Celeron 570) and QM67,QS67,HM67,HM65 (Celeron 807).

    FeatureCeleron 570Celeron 807
    Socket
    PGA478
    BGA1023
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0
    PCIe 2.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR2-667
    DDR3-1333+100%
    Max RAM Capacity
    4 GB
    16 GB+300%
    RAM Channels
    2
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    0
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: No (Celeron 570) vs VT-x (Celeron 807). The Celeron 807 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Celeron 570 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 570 targets Budget, Celeron 807 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron 570 rivals Pentium T2310.

    FeatureCeleron 570Celeron 807
    Integrated GPU
    No
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
    Unlocked
    No
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    No
    Virtualization
    No
    VT-x
    Target Use
    Budget
    Mobile
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Celeron 570 was priced at $134, while the Celeron 807 came in at $70. On launch pricing ($134 vs $70), Celeron 807 was $64 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 570 delivers 3.8 pts/$ vs 7.6 pts/$ for the Celeron 807 — making the Celeron 807 the 67.9% better value option.

    FeatureCeleron 570Celeron 807
    MSRP
    $134
    $70-48%
    Performance per Dollar
    3.8
    7.6+100%
    Release Date
    2008
    2012

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.