Celeron 570 vs Pentium M 760

Celeron 570

31 WW2008

Pentium M 760

1 Cores1 Thrd27 WWMax: 2 GHz2005

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Celeron 570

505

0.0%

515

+2.0%

Celeron 2.10

Pentium M 1.40

Mobile Pentium 4 2.66

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 570 is positioned at rank 1230 and the Pentium M 760 is on rank 636, so the Pentium M 760 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 570

#1218

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

7782%

#1219

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

7668%

#1220

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

7040%

#1221

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

7008%

#1222

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

6944%

#1224

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

6706%

#1225

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

6430%

#1226

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

6419%

#1227

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

6247%

#1230

Celeron 570

MSRP: $134|Avg: $15

100%

#1231

Core i7-820QM

MSRP: $546|Avg: N/A

88%

#1233

Core Duo T2700

MSRP: $663|Avg: N/A

75%

#1235

Pentium SU4100

MSRP: $289|Avg: $15

63%

#1236

Core Solo T1400

MSRP: $200|Avg: $5

57%

#1237

Core i7-940XM

MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A

55%

#1238

Core Solo T1350

MSRP: $200|Avg: $70

54%

#1240

Core Solo T1300

MSRP: $209|Avg: $10

49%

#1241

Core Solo T1200

MSRP: $209|Avg: $10

45%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 760

#187

Core Ultra 9 288V

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

98%

#188

Core i7-10870H

MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A

98%

#624

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

855%

#625

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

842%

#626

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

773%

#627

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

770%

#628

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

763%

#630

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

736%

#631

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

706%

#632

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

705%

#633

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

686%

#636

Pentium M 760

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#638

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

MSRP: $80|Avg: $10

99%

#650

Core i5-1345UE

MSRP: $312|Avg: $312

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Pentium M 760 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron 570 in both compute-intensive tasks (2% faster) and gaming workloads.

Insight	Celeron 570	Pentium M 760
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($15)	✅ More affordable ($0)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 65 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Dothan (2004−2005) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	Celeron 570	Pentium M 760
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($15)	✅ More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Celeron 570 Benchmark Check

Pentium M 760 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 570 and Pentium M 760

Celeron 570

The Celeron 570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.26 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium M 760

The Pentium M 760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Pentium M 760 is built on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 570 scores 505 against the Pentium M 760's 515 — a 2% lead for the Pentium M 760. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 570 vs 0 kB on the Pentium M 760.

Feature	Celeron 570	Pentium M 760
Cores / Threads	—	1 / 1
Boost Clock	—	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.26 GHz+13%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	1 MB L2 Cache	0 kB
L2 Cache	—	2 MB
Process	65 nm-28%	90 nm
Architecture	—	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	505	515+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	240

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 2.0. Both support up to DDR2-667 memory speed. The Celeron 570 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: GL40,GM45 (Celeron 570) and 915GM,915PM (Pentium M 760).

Feature	Celeron 570	Pentium M 760
Socket	PGA478	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-667	DDR2-533
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization: No (Celeron 570) / not specified (Pentium M 760). Primary use case: Celeron 570 targets Budget, Pentium M 760 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron 570 rivals Pentium T2310; Pentium M 760 rivals Pentium M 750.