PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 570 vs Celeron 900 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 570 vs Celeron 900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 570

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 31W instead of 35W, a 4W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).

Celeron 900

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $48 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
✅Delivers 49.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 5.6 vs 3.8 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron 570 across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (485 vs 505).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 570 better than Celeron 900?

Yes. Celeron 570 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.3% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data and 4.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 570 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.3% more average FPS across 39 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 570 is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.1% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 570 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron 570 comes in 55.8% more expensive on MSRP at $134 MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.3% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron 900 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 49.6% better value on paper (5.6 vs 3.8 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 900 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 570 vs Celeron 900 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 570

The Celeron 570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.26 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron 900

The Celeron 900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 485 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

In PassMark, the Celeron 570 scores 505 against the Celeron 900's 485 — a 4% lead for the Celeron 570. Both processors carry 1 MB L2 Cache of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron 570	Celeron 900
Base Clock	2.26 GHz+3%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	1 MB L2 Cache	1 MB L2 Cache
Process	65 nm	45 nm-31%
PassMark	505+4%	485
Geekbench 6 Single	—	220
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	229

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 2.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Celeron 570 versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron 900 — the Celeron 900 supports 99.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron 570) vs 1 (Celeron 900). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: GL40,GM45 (Celeron 570) and GL40,GM45 (Celeron 900).

Feature	Celeron 570	Celeron 900
Socket	PGA478	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-667	DDR3-1333+100%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support No virtualization. Primary use case: Celeron 570 targets Budget, Celeron 900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 570 rivals Pentium T2310; Celeron 900 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.

Feature	Celeron 570	Celeron 900
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	No	No
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 570 was priced at $134, while the Celeron 900 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($134 vs $86), Celeron 900 was $48 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 570 delivers 3.8 pts/$ vs 5.6 pts/$ for the Celeron 900 — making the Celeron 900 the 39.8% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 570	Celeron 900
MSRP	$134	$86-36%
Performance per Dollar	3.8	5.6+47%
Release Date	2008	2009

Search Celeron 570 on Amazon

Search Celeron 900 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.