Celeron 570 vs Sempron 140

CPU

GPU

Celeron 570

31 WW2008

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Sempron 140

1 Cores1 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2009

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Celeron 570 vs Sempron 140 Performance Spectrum

Celeron 570

505

0.0%

513

+1.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 570 vs Sempron 140 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 570 vs Sempron 140: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 570

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 31W instead of 45W, a 14W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (505 vs 513).
❌Launch MSRP is still $134 MSRP, while Sempron 140 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Sempron 140.

Sempron 140

2009

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Celeron 570.

Trade-offs

❌45.2% higher power demand at 45W vs 31W.

Quick Answers

So, is Sempron 140 better than Celeron 570?

Yes. Sempron 140 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 1.6% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Sempron 140 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 1.6% stronger overall PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 140 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Sempron 140 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Sempron 140 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.6% higher PassMark. Celeron 570 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (3.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Sempron 140 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 570 vs Sempron 140 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 570

The Celeron 570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.26 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.

Sempron 140

The Sempron 140 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 July 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Sargas (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 513 points. Launch price was $40.

⚡

Processing Power

The Sempron 140 is built on the Sargas (2009−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 570 scores 505 against the Sempron 140's 513 — a 1.6% lead for the Sempron 140. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 570 vs 0 kB on the Sempron 140.

Feature	Celeron 570	Sempron 140
Cores / Threads	—	1 / 1
Boost Clock	—	2.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.26 GHz	2.7 GHz+19%
L3 Cache	1 MB L2 Cache	0 kB
L2 Cache	—	1 MB (per core)
Process	65 nm	45 nm-31%
Architecture	—	Sargas (2009−2011)
PassMark	505	513+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	292

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 570 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron 140 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Celeron 570 versus DDR3-1066 on the Sempron 140 — the Sempron 140 supports 59.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: GL40,GM45 (Celeron 570) and AM3,AM2+ (Sempron 140).

Feature	Celeron 570	Sempron 140
Socket	PGA478	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-667	DDR3-1066+60%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Sempron 140 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: No (Celeron 570) vs AMD-V (Sempron 140). Primary use case: Celeron 570 targets Budget, Sempron 140 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 570 rivals Pentium T2310; Sempron 140 rivals Celeron 420.