Celeron 570
Sempron 3800+
Celeron 570 vs Sempron 3800+ Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron 570 vs Sempron 3800+ FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron 570 vs Sempron 3800+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron 570
2008Why buy it
- ✅Draws 31W instead of 62W, a 31W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (505 vs 528).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $134 MSRP, while Sempron 3800+ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Sempron 3800+
2006Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 62W vs 31W.
Quick Answers
So, is Sempron 3800+ better than Celeron 570?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 570 vs Sempron 3800+ Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Celeron 570
The Celeron 570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.26 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.
Sempron 3800+
The Sempron 3800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Manila (2001−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 528 points. Launch price was $21.
Processing Power
The Sempron 3800+ is built on the Manila (2001−2006) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 570 scores 505 against the Sempron 3800+'s 528 — a 4.5% lead for the Sempron 3800+. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 570 vs 0 kB on the Sempron 3800+.
| Feature | Celeron 570 | Sempron 3800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | — | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | — | 2.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.26 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | — | 256 kB |
| Process | 65 nm-28% | 90 nm |
| Architecture | — | Manila (2001−2006) |
| PassMark | 505 | 528+5% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 570 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron 3800+ uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron 570 | Sempron 3800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | AM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: No (Celeron 570) / not specified (Sempron 3800+). Primary use case: Celeron 570 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 570 rivals Pentium T2310.
| Feature | Celeron 570 | Sempron 3800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | No | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron 570 and Sempron 3800+
