Atom D510 vs Celeron 570

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom D510 vs Celeron 570 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom D510 vs Celeron 570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom D510

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 13W instead of 31W, a 18W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3150, while Celeron 570 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Celeron 570

2008

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (505 vs 525).
❌Launch MSRP is still $134 MSRP, while Atom D510 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌138.5% higher power demand at 31W vs 13W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom D510 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom D510 better than Celeron 570?

Yes. Atom D510 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom D510 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom D510 is the stronger fit. You are getting 4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom D510 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Atom D510 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron 570 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (3.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom D510 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom D510 vs Celeron 570 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom D510

The Atom D510 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 December 2009 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $97.

Celeron 570

The Celeron 570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.26 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom D510 is built on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Atom D510 scores 525 against the Celeron 570's 505 — a 3.9% lead for the Atom D510. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom D510 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 570.

Feature	Atom D510	Celeron 570
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	—
Boost Clock	1.67 GHz	—
Base Clock	1.66 GHz	2.26 GHz+36%
L3 Cache	0 kB	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	—
Process	45 nm-31%	65 nm
Architecture	Pineview (2009−2011)	—
PassMark	525+4%	505
Geekbench 6 Single	130	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	350	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom D510 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 570 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Atom D510 versus DDR2-667 on the Celeron 570 — the Atom D510 supports 19.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (Atom D510) vs 2 (Celeron 570). PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom D510) vs 0 (Celeron 570) — the Atom D510 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: NM10 (Atom D510) and GL40,GM45 (Celeron 570).

Feature	Atom D510	Celeron 570
Socket	FCBGA559	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800+20%	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: None (Atom D510) vs No (Celeron 570). The Atom D510 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Celeron 570 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Atom D510 targets Nettop, Celeron 570 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 570 rivals Pentium T2310.