Athlon 64 3400+
VS
Atom D510

Athlon 64 3400+ vs Atom D510

AMD

Athlon 64 3400+

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2001
VS
Intel

Atom D510

2 Cores4 Thrd13 WWMax: 1.67 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 3400+ is positioned at rank 1116 and the Atom D510 is on rank 626, so the Atom D510 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 3400+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
251383%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
237532%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
172468%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
51957%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
41156%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
36003%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
20621%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
20352%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
18531%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
18529%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
18322%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
17827%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
17578%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
17507%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
17348%
#1116
Athlon 64 3400+
MSRP: $440|Avg: $20
100%
#1117
Pentium 4 2.26
MSRP: $241|Avg: $20
98%
#1118
Athlon 64 3200+
MSRP: $417|Avg: $10
98%
#1119
Athlon 64 FX-60
MSRP: $1031|Avg: $1000
94%
#1120
Pentium Extreme Edition 965
MSRP: $999|Avg: $100
94%
#1121
Athlon XP 2200+
MSRP: $241|Avg: $30
94%
#1122
Athlon XP 1700+
MSRP: $190|Avg: $15
90%
#1123
Pentium Extreme Edition 955
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
89%
#1124
Athlon XP 2700+
MSRP: $349|Avg: $20
83%
#1125
Athlon XP 2800+
MSRP: $375|Avg: $35
81%
#1126
Pentium III 1200
MSRP: $200|Avg: $10
79%
#1127
Athlon XP 3200+
MSRP: $464|Avg: $40
77%
#1128
Pentium III 1400
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
73%
#1129
Pentium III 1400S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
73%
#1130
Pentium 4 2.60
MSRP: $401|Avg: $25
73%
#1131
Athlon XP 1800+
MSRP: $252|Avg: $30
72%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom D510

#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
97%
#614
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
838%
#615
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
826%
#616
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
758%
#617
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
755%
#618
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
748%
#620
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
722%
#621
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
693%
#622
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
691%
#623
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
673%
#626
Atom D510
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#628
Core i5-1335UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
100%
#638
Celeron Dual-Core T1400
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom D510 (2009) utilizes 45 nm technology and DDR2, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAthlon 64 3400+Atom D510
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Clawhammer (2001−2005) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Pineview (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon 64 3400+ (2001) relies on 130 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAthlon 64 3400+Atom D510
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 3400+ and Atom D510

AMD

Athlon 64 3400+

The Athlon 64 3400+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Atom D510

The Atom D510 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 December 2009 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $97.

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 3400+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Atom D510 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom D510 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Athlon 64 3400+ versus 1.67 GHz on the Atom D510 — a 35.9% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 3400+. The Athlon 64 3400+ uses the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Atom D510 uses Pineview (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3400+ scores 545 against the Atom D510's 525 — a 3.7% lead for the Athlon 64 3400+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAthlon 64 3400+Atom D510
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz+44%
1.67 GHz
Base Clock
1.66 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K
512 kB (per core)
Process
130 nm
45 nm-65%
Architecture
Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Pineview (2009−2011)
PassMark
545+4%
525
Geekbench 6 Single
130
Geekbench 6 Multi
350
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 3400+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Atom D510 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-400 on the Athlon 64 3400+ versus DDR2-800 on the Atom D510 — the Atom D510 supports -202% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 3400+) vs 4 (Atom D510) — the Atom D510 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 754 (Athlon 64 3400+) and NM10 (Atom D510).

FeatureAthlon 64 3400+Atom D510
Socket
754
FCBGA559
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR-400
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
RAM Channels
1
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 3400+) / None (Atom D510). The Atom D510 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Athlon 64 3400+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Atom D510 targets Nettop.

FeatureAthlon 64 3400+Atom D510
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel GMA 3150
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
None
Target Use
Nettop