Atom D510 vs Celeron 807

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom D510 vs Celeron 807 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom D510 vs Celeron 807: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom D510

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 13W instead of 17W, a 4W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (525 vs 535).

Celeron 807

2012

Why buy it

✅+1.9% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $70 MSRP, while Atom D510 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌30.8% higher power demand at 17W vs 13W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 807 better than Atom D510?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Atom D510 is ahead with a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 807 pulls ahead with 1.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 807 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 807 is the better buy right now. Celeron 807 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $70 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.9% better PassMark. The compromise is that Atom D510 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 807 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom D510 vs Celeron 807 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom D510

The Atom D510 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 December 2009 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $97.

Celeron 807

The Celeron 807 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 535 points. Launch price was $70.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom D510 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron 807 offers 1 cores / 2 threads — the Atom D510 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.67 GHz on the Atom D510 versus 1.5 GHz on the Celeron 807 — a 10.7% clock advantage for the Atom D510 (base: 1.66 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Atom D510 uses the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron 807 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Atom D510 scores 525 against the Celeron 807's 535 — a 1.9% lead for the Celeron 807. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom D510 vs 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron 807.

Feature	Atom D510	Celeron 807
Cores / Threads	2 / 4+100%	1 / 2
Boost Clock	1.67 GHz+11%	1.5 GHz
Base Clock	1.66 GHz+11%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	1.5 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	45 nm	32 nm-29%
Architecture	Pineview (2009−2011)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	525	535+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	130	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	350	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom D510 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 807 uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Atom D510 versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron 807 — the Celeron 807 supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 807 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom D510) vs 2 (Celeron 807). PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom D510) vs 0 (Celeron 807) — the Atom D510 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: NM10 (Atom D510) and QM67,QS67,HM67,HM65 (Celeron 807).

Feature	Atom D510	Celeron 807
Socket	FCBGA559	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	DDR3-1333+67%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	16 GB+300%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: None (Atom D510) vs VT-x (Celeron 807). Both include integrated graphics — Intel GMA 3150 (Atom D510) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron 807) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Atom D510 targets Nettop, Celeron 807 targets Mobile.