Atom D510 vs Celeron 807
Atom D510
Celeron 807
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom D510 is positioned at rank 626 and the Celeron 807 is on rank 1141, so the Atom D510 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Atom D510
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 807
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Atom D510 | Celeron 807 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Pineview (2009−2011) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Atom D510 | Celeron 807 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Atom D510 and Celeron 807
Atom D510
The Atom D510 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 December 2009 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $97.
Celeron 807
The Celeron 807 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 535 points. Launch price was $70.
Processing Power
The Atom D510 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron 807 offers 1 cores / 2 threads — the Atom D510 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.67 GHz on the Atom D510 versus 1.5 GHz on the Celeron 807 — a 10.7% clock advantage for the Atom D510 (base: 1.66 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Atom D510 uses the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron 807 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Atom D510 scores 525 against the Celeron 807's 535 — a 1.9% lead for the Celeron 807. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom D510 vs 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron 807.
| Feature | Atom D510 | Celeron 807 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4+100% | 1 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.67 GHz+11% | 1.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.66 GHz+11% | 1.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 1.5 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Pineview (2009−2011) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 525 | 535+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 130 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 350 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Atom D510 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 807 uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Atom D510 versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron 807 — the Celeron 807 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 807 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom D510) vs 2 (Celeron 807). PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom D510) vs 0 (Celeron 807) — the Atom D510 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: NM10 (Atom D510) and QM67,QS67,HM67,HM65 (Celeron 807).
| Feature | Atom D510 | Celeron 807 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA559 | BGA1023 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | DDR3-1333+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 16 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: None (Atom D510) vs VT-x (Celeron 807). Both include integrated graphics — Intel GMA 3150 (Atom D510) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron 807) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Atom D510 targets Nettop, Celeron 807 targets Mobile.
| Feature | Atom D510 | Celeron 807 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel GMA 3150 | HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | None | VT-x |
| Target Use | Nettop | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Atom D510 and Celeron 807
