Atom D510 vs Celeron SU2300

Atom D510

2 Cores4 Thrd13 WWMax: 1.67 GHz2009

Celeron SU2300

10 WW2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Atom D510

2 / 4

525

0.0%

545

+3.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom D510 is positioned at rank 626 and the Celeron SU2300 is on rank 1223, so the Atom D510 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom D510

#187

Core Ultra 9 288V

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

97%

#614

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

838%

#615

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

826%

#616

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

758%

#617

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

755%

#618

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

748%

#620

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

722%

#621

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

693%

#622

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

691%

#623

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

673%

#626

Atom D510

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#628

Core i5-1335UE

MSRP: $312|Avg: $312

100%

#638

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

MSRP: $80|Avg: $10

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron SU2300

#1211

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

7209%

#1212

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

7103%

#1213

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

6521%

#1214

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

6491%

#1215

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

6432%

#1217

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

6211%

#1218

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

5956%

#1219

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

5946%

#1220

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

5786%

#1223

Celeron SU2300

MSRP: $134|Avg: $134

100%

#1224

Core i5-560UM

MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A

100%

#1225

Core i7-660UM

MSRP: $317|Avg: N/A

99%

#1226

C-30

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

99%

#1228

Core i7-620UM

MSRP: $278|Avg: N/A

96%

#1230

Celeron 570

MSRP: $134|Avg: $15

93%

#1231

Core i7-820QM

MSRP: $546|Avg: N/A

82%

#1233

Core Duo T2700

MSRP: $663|Avg: N/A

69%

#1235

Pentium SU4100

MSRP: $289|Avg: $15

58%

#1236

Core Solo T1400

MSRP: $200|Avg: $5

53%

#1237

Core i7-940XM

MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A

51%

#1238

Core Solo T1350

MSRP: $200|Avg: $70

50%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Atom D510 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron SU2300 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 3.7% greater multi-core processing power.

Insight	Atom D510	Celeron SU2300
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($134)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Pineview (2009−2011) / 45 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	Atom D510	Celeron SU2300
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($134)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Atom D510 Benchmark Check

Celeron SU2300 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom D510 and Celeron SU2300

Atom D510

The Atom D510 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 December 2009 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $97.

Celeron SU2300

The Celeron SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom D510 is built on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Atom D510 scores 525 against the Celeron SU2300's 545 — a 3.7% lead for the Celeron SU2300. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom D510 vs 1 MB on the Celeron SU2300.

Feature	Atom D510	Celeron SU2300
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	—
Boost Clock	1.67 GHz	—
Base Clock	1.66 GHz+38%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	1 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	—
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Pineview (2009−2011)	—
PassMark	525	545+4%
Geekbench 6 Single	130	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	350	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom D510 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron SU2300 uses BGA956 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Atom D510	Celeron SU2300
Socket	FCBGA559	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	❌	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: None (Atom D510) / not specified (Celeron SU2300). The Atom D510 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Celeron SU2300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Atom D510 targets Nettop.