Atom D510 vs Celeron SU2300

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom D510 vs Celeron SU2300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom D510 vs Celeron SU2300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom D510

2009

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3150, while Celeron SU2300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron SU2300 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (525 vs 545).
❌30% higher power demand at 13W vs 10W.

Celeron SU2300

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 10W instead of 13W, a 3W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $134 MSRP, while Atom D510 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom D510 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron SU2300 better than Atom D510?

Yes. Celeron SU2300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 3.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron SU2300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron SU2300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.8% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron SU2300 is the better buy right now. Celeron SU2300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $134 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (4.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron SU2300 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Atom D510 vs Celeron SU2300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom D510

The Atom D510 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 December 2009 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $97.

Celeron SU2300

The Celeron SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom D510 is built on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Atom D510 scores 525 against the Celeron SU2300's 545 — a 3.7% lead for the Celeron SU2300. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom D510 vs 1 MB on the Celeron SU2300.

Feature	Atom D510	Celeron SU2300
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	—
Boost Clock	1.67 GHz	—
Base Clock	1.66 GHz+38%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	1 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	—
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Pineview (2009−2011)	—
PassMark	525	545+4%
Geekbench 6 Single	130	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	350	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom D510 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron SU2300 uses BGA956 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Atom D510	Celeron SU2300
Socket	FCBGA559	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: None (Atom D510) / not specified (Celeron SU2300). The Atom D510 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Celeron SU2300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Atom D510 targets Nettop.