Atom D510 vs Pentium M 760

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom D510 vs Pentium M 760 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom D510 vs Pentium M 760: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom D510

2009

Why buy it

✅+1.9% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 13W instead of 27W, a 14W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3150, while Pentium M 760 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (130 vs 240).

Pentium M 760

2005

Why buy it

✅+84.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (515 vs 525).
❌107.7% higher power demand at 27W vs 13W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom D510 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom D510 better than Pentium M 760?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium M 760 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom D510 pulls ahead with 1.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom D510 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom D510 still makes the most sense overall. Atom D510 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.9% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom D510 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2005) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom D510 vs Pentium M 760 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom D510

The Atom D510 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 December 2009 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $97.

Pentium M 760

The Pentium M 760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom D510 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium M 760 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Atom D510 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.67 GHz on the Atom D510 versus 2 GHz on the Pentium M 760 — a 18% clock advantage for the Pentium M 760 (base: 1.66 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Atom D510 uses the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium M 760 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Atom D510 scores 525 against the Pentium M 760's 515 — a 1.9% lead for the Atom D510. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 130 vs 240, a 59.5% lead for the Pentium M 760 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom D510	Pentium M 760
Cores / Threads	2 / 4+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.67 GHz	2 GHz+20%
Base Clock	1.66 GHz	2 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB+300%
Process	45 nm-50%	90 nm
Architecture	Pineview (2009−2011)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	525+2%	515
Geekbench 6 Single	130	240+85%
Geekbench 6 Multi	350	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom D510 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium M 760 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Atom D510 versus DDR2-533 on the Pentium M 760 — the Atom D510 supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom D510 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom D510) vs 2 (Pentium M 760). PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom D510) vs 0 (Pentium M 760) — the Atom D510 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: NM10 (Atom D510) and 915GM,915PM (Pentium M 760).

Feature	Atom D510	Pentium M 760
Socket	FCBGA559	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800+50%	DDR2-533
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization: None (Atom D510) / not specified (Pentium M 760). The Atom D510 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Pentium M 760 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Atom D510 targets Nettop, Pentium M 760 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Pentium M 760 rivals Pentium M 750.