Celeron 570 vs Turion 64 ML-34

CPU

GPU

Celeron 570

31 WW2008

Buy on Amazon

Turion 64 ML-34

1 Cores1 Thrd35 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2005

Buy on Amazon

Celeron 570 vs Turion 64 ML-34 Performance Spectrum

Celeron 570

505

0.0%

515

+2.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 570 vs Turion 64 ML-34 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 570 vs Turion 64 ML-34: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 570

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 31W instead of 35W, a 4W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (505 vs 515).
❌Launch MSRP is still $134 MSRP, while Turion 64 ML-34 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Turion 64 ML-34

2005

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion 64 ML-34 better than Celeron 570?

Yes. Turion 64 ML-34 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Turion 64 ML-34 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 2% stronger overall PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 ML-34 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion 64 ML-34 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Turion 64 ML-34 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you 2.0% higher PassMark. Celeron 570 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (3.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 570 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2008 vs 2005). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 570 vs Turion 64 ML-34 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 570

The Celeron 570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.26 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.

Turion 64 ML-34

The Turion 64 ML-34 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Turion 64 ML-34 is built on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 570 scores 505 against the Turion 64 ML-34's 515 — a 2% lead for the Turion 64 ML-34. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 570 vs 0 kB on the Turion 64 ML-34.

Feature	Celeron 570	Turion 64 ML-34
Cores / Threads	—	1 / 1
Boost Clock	—	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.26 GHz	—
L3 Cache	1 MB L2 Cache	0 kB
L2 Cache	—	1 MB
Process	65 nm-28%	90 nm
Architecture	—	Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark	505	515+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 570 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion 64 ML-34 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Celeron 570 versus DDR-400 on the Turion 64 ML-34 — the Celeron 570 supports -266.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 570 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron 570) vs 1 (Turion 64 ML-34). PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron 570) vs 16 (Turion 64 ML-34) — the Turion 64 ML-34 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Celeron 570	Turion 64 ML-34
Socket	PGA478	754
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-667	DDR-400
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: No (Celeron 570) vs AMD-V (Turion 64 ML-34). Primary use case: Celeron 570 targets Budget, Turion 64 ML-34 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron 570 rivals Pentium T2310.