Celeron 925 vs Ryzen 7 5800X
Celeron 925
Popular choices:
Ryzen 7 5800X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Celeron 925 is positioned at rank #1202 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 925
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 5800X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron 925 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($100) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm) | ✨ Modern (Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) / 7 nm, 12 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron 925 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+2832%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($100) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 925 and Ryzen 7 5800X
Celeron 925
The Celeron 925 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $69.
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5800X is built on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 925 scores 525 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 — a 192.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 925 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | Celeron 925 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | — | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | — | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3.8 GHz+65% |
| L3 Cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | 32 MB+3100% |
| L2 Cache | — | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-84% |
| Architecture | — | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 525 | 27,712+5178% |
Memory & Platform
Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron 925 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5800X — the Ryzen 7 5800X supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 5800X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Celeron 925) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 5800X). PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron 925) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5800X) — the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GL40,GM45 (Celeron 925) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 5800X).
| Feature | Celeron 925 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | — | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR4-3200+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 128 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 5800X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: No (Celeron 925) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X). Primary use case: Celeron 925 targets Budget, Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron 925 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.
| Feature | Celeron 925 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | No | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Celeron 925 launched at $100 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5800X debuted at $449. At current prices ($100 vs $180), the Celeron 925 is $80 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 925 delivers 5.3 pts/$ vs 154.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5800X — making the Ryzen 7 5800X the 186.8% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 925 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-78% | $449 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-44% | $180 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.3 | 154.0+2806% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron 925 and Ryzen 7 5800X
