Celeron B730 vs Opteron 254

Celeron B730 vs Opteron 254 Performance Spectrum

Celeron B730

1 / 2

715

+3.6%

Mobile Pentium 4 2.66

690

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron B730 vs Opteron 254 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron B730 vs Opteron 254: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron B730

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 92W, a 57W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Opteron 254 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $70 MSRP, while Opteron 254 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Opteron 254

2005

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron B730 across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (690 vs 715).
❌162.9% higher power demand at 92W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron B730 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron B730 better than Opteron 254?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 254 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron B730 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron B730 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.0% more average FPS across 39 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron B730 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.6% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron B730 is the better buy right now. Celeron B730 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $70 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.0% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron B730 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2005) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron B730 vs Opteron 254 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron B730

The Celeron B730 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 256 kB + 1.5 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 715 points. Launch price was $70.

Opteron 254

The Opteron 254 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Troy (2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 92 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 690 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron B730 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Opteron 254's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron B730 versus 2.8 GHz on the Opteron 254 — a 43.5% clock advantage for the Opteron 254. The Celeron B730 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Opteron 254 uses Troy (2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron B730 scores 715 against the Opteron 254's 690 — a 3.6% lead for the Celeron B730. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron B730 vs 0 kB on the Opteron 254.

Feature	Celeron B730	Opteron 254
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2.8 GHz+56%
L3 Cache	1.5 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	32 nm-64%	90 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Troy (2005)
PassMark	715+4%	690

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B730 uses the G2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Opteron 254 uses 940 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron B730	Opteron 254
Socket	G2	940
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron B730) / not specified (Opteron 254). The Celeron B730 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Opteron 254 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B730 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B730 rivals Pentium 967.