Celeron B800 vs V-Series V140

Celeron B800 vs V-Series V140 Performance Spectrum

Celeron B800

2 / 2

1,910

0.0%

1,913

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron B800 vs V-Series V140 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron B800 vs V-Series V140: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron B800

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while V-Series V140 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,910 vs 1,913).
❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while V-Series V140 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

V-Series V140

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron B800 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is V-Series V140 better than Celeron B800?

Yes. V-Series V140 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, V-Series V140 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, V-Series V140 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

V-Series V140 is still the much better call for a fresh build. V-Series V140 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron B800 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (23.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron B800 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron B800 vs V-Series V140 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron B800

The Celeron B800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,910 points. Launch price was $80.

V-Series V140

The V-Series V140 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,913 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron B800 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the V-Series V140 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron B800 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Celeron B800 versus 2.3 GHz on the V-Series V140 — a 42.1% clock advantage for the V-Series V140. The Celeron B800 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the V-Series V140 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron B800 scores 1,910 against the V-Series V140's 1,913 — a 0.2% lead for the V-Series V140.

Feature	Celeron B800	V-Series V140
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.5 GHz	2.3 GHz+53%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Champlain (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,910	1,913

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B800 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the V-Series V140 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron B800	V-Series V140
Socket	PGA988	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron B800) / not specified (V-Series V140). The Celeron B800 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the V-Series V140 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B800 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B800 rivals Pentium 967.