Celeron B800 vs PRO A6-8570

Celeron B800 vs PRO A6-8570 Performance Spectrum

Celeron B800

2 / 2

1,910

0.0%

1,919

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron B800 vs PRO A6-8570 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron B800 vs PRO A6-8570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron B800

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while PRO A6-8570 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,910 vs 1,919).
❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while PRO A6-8570 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

PRO A6-8570

2018

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron B800 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is PRO A6-8570 better than Celeron B800?

Yes. PRO A6-8570 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, PRO A6-8570 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, PRO A6-8570 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

PRO A6-8570 is still the much better call for a fresh build. PRO A6-8570 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron B800 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (23.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A6-8570 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron B800 vs PRO A6-8570 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron B800

The Celeron B800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,910 points. Launch price was $80.

PRO A6-8570

The PRO A6-8570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 1,919 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron B800 and PRO A6-8570 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Celeron B800 versus 3.8 GHz on the PRO A6-8570 — a 86.8% clock advantage for the PRO A6-8570 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Celeron B800 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the PRO A6-8570 uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron B800 scores 1,910 against the PRO A6-8570's 1,919 — a 0.5% lead for the PRO A6-8570.

Feature	Celeron B800	PRO A6-8570
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.5 GHz	3.8 GHz+153%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	3.5 GHz+133%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1024 kB+300%
Process	32 nm	28 nm-13%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	1,910	1,919

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B800 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the PRO A6-8570 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron B800	PRO A6-8570
Socket	PGA988	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron B800) / not specified (PRO A6-8570). The Celeron B800 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the PRO A6-8570 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B800 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B800 rivals Pentium 967.