Celeron B800
VS
Pentium G3240

Celeron B800 vs Pentium G3240

Intel

Celeron B800

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Pentium G3240

2 Cores2 Thrd53 WW2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron B800 is positioned at rank 810 and the Pentium G3240 is on rank 757, so the Pentium G3240 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron B800

#798
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1229%
#799
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1211%
#800
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1111%
#801
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1106%
#802
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1096%
#804
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1059%
#805
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1015%
#806
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1013%
#807
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
986%
#810
Celeron B800
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
100%
#811
Celeron B710
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
100%
#812
Athlon II Neo K345
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#818
Core i7-8709G
MSRP: $338|Avg: $150
98%
#819
Celeron M 560
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
98%
#824
Celeron Dual-Core T3000
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
94%
#825
Pentium P6100
MSRP: $100|Avg: $16.39
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G3240

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
14371%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
13580%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9860%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2970%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2353%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2058%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1179%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1163%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1059%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1059%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1047%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1019%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1005%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1001%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
992%
#757
Pentium G3240
MSRP: $89|Avg: $126
100%
#758
Core i5-3550S
MSRP: $205|Avg: $100
100%
#759
FX-8140
MSRP: $225|Avg: $120
100%
#760
Athlon X2 450
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
99%
#761
Athlon II X3 450
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#762
Core i7-4790
MSRP: $339|Avg: $60
99%
#763
Pentium G640
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
99%
#764
Pentium G840
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#765
Core i5-6440EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
98%
#767
Core i5-4590T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $130
98%
#769
Celeron G530T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $17
97%
#770
Core i7-4770K
MSRP: $339|Avg: $100
97%
#771
A10-9700
MSRP: $169|Avg: $40
97%
#772
Core i5-2400
MSRP: $184|Avg: $25
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron B800 leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium G3240 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron B800Pentium G3240
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($5)
⚠️ Higher cost ($126)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Celeron B800 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 96% cheaper ($5 vs $126) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCeleron B800Pentium G3240
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+2394%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($5)
⚠️ Higher cost ($126)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron B800 and Pentium G3240

Intel

Celeron B800

The Celeron B800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,910 points. Launch price was $80.

Intel

Pentium G3240

The Pentium G3240 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,930 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron B800 and Pentium G3240 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Celeron B800 is built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron B800 scores 1,910 against the Pentium G3240's 1,930 — a 1% lead for the Pentium G3240. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron B800 vs 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Pentium G3240.

FeatureCeleron B800Pentium G3240
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.5 GHz
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
3.1 GHz+107%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
3 MB Intel® Smart Cache+50%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,910
1,930+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B800 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G3240 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron B800Pentium G3240
Socket
PGA988
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron B800) / not specified (Pentium G3240). The Celeron B800 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium G3240 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B800 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B800 rivals Pentium 967.

FeatureCeleron B800Pentium G3240
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron B800 launched at $80 MSRP, while the Pentium G3240 debuted at $89. At current prices ($5 vs $126), the Celeron B800 is $121 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron B800 delivers 382.0 pts/$ vs 15.3 pts/$ for the Pentium G3240 — making the Celeron B800 the 184.6% better value option.

FeatureCeleron B800Pentium G3240
MSRP
$80-10%
$89
Avg Price (30d)
$5-96%
$126
Performance per Dollar
382.0+2397%
15.3
Release Date
2011
2014