
Celeron B800

Pentium G3240
Celeron B800 vs Pentium G3240 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron B800 vs Pentium G3240 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron B800 vs Pentium G3240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron B800
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $9 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.9 vs 21.7 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 53W, a 18W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Pentium G3240 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,910 vs 1,930).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
Pentium G3240
2014Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.7 vs 23.9 PassMark/$ ($89 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- ❌51.4% higher power demand at 53W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron B800 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium G3240 better than Celeron B800?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron B800 vs Pentium G3240 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron B800
The Celeron B800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,910 points. Launch price was $80.

Pentium G3240
The Pentium G3240 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,930 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron B800 and Pentium G3240 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Celeron B800 is built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron B800 scores 1,910 against the Pentium G3240's 1,930 — a 1% lead for the Pentium G3240. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron B800 vs 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Pentium G3240.
| Feature | Celeron B800 | Pentium G3240 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.5 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 1.5 GHz | 3.1 GHz+107% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | — |
| Process | 32 nm | 22 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | — |
| PassMark | 1,910 | 1,930+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron B800 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G3240 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron B800 | Pentium G3240 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron B800) / not specified (Pentium G3240). The Celeron B800 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium G3240 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B800 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B800 rivals Pentium 967.
| Feature | Celeron B800 | Pentium G3240 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron B800 was priced at $80, while the Pentium G3240 came in at $89. On launch pricing ($80 vs $89), Celeron B800 was $9 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron B800 delivers 23.9 pts/$ vs 21.7 pts/$ for the Pentium G3240 — making the Celeron B800 the 9.6% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron B800 | Pentium G3240 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80-10% | $89 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.9+10% | 21.7 |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














