Celeron E1500 vs Celeron 877
Celeron E1500
Celeron 877
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron E1500 is positioned at rank 907 and the Celeron 877 is on rank 1097, so the Celeron E1500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron E1500
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 877
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron E1500 | Celeron 877 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($5) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Allendale (2006−2009) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron E1500 | Celeron 877 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+185%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($5) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron E1500 and Celeron 877
Celeron E1500
The Celeron E1500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 November 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 765 points. Launch price was $63.
Celeron 877
The Celeron 877 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 805 points. Launch price was $86.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron E1500 and Celeron 877 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron E1500 versus 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 877 — a 44.4% clock advantage for the Celeron E1500 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The Celeron E1500 uses the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron 877 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron E1500 scores 765 against the Celeron 877's 805 — a 5.1% lead for the Celeron 877. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron E1500 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 877.
| Feature | Celeron E1500 | Celeron 877 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz+57% | 1.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+57% | 1.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (total)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 65 nm | 32 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Allendale (2006−2009) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 765 | 805+5% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 285 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 515 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron E1500 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron 877 uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Celeron E1500 versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron 877 — the Celeron 877 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 877 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron E1500) vs 16 (Celeron 877) — the Celeron 877 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: G31,P35,G41 (Celeron E1500) and HM65,HM67,HM75,HM76,HM77 (Celeron 877).
| Feature | Celeron E1500 | Celeron 877 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | BGA1023 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | DDR3-1333+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: No (Celeron E1500) vs VT-x (Celeron 877). The Celeron 877 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Celeron E1500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron E1500 targets Budget, Celeron 877 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E1500 rivals Pentium E2200; Celeron 877 rivals Pentium 967.
| Feature | Celeron E1500 | Celeron 877 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | No | VT-x |
| Target Use | Budget | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Celeron E1500 launched at $53 MSRP, while the Celeron 877 debuted at $86. At current prices ($5 vs $15), the Celeron E1500 is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron E1500 delivers 153.0 pts/$ vs 53.7 pts/$ for the Celeron 877 — making the Celeron E1500 the 96.1% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron E1500 | Celeron 877 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $53-38% | $86 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-67% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 153.0+185% | 53.7 |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron E1500 and Celeron 877
