CPU
GPU
Celeron E3200
Celeron 3215U
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron E3200 is positioned at rank 683 and the Celeron 3215U is on rank 241, so the Celeron 3215U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron E3200
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 3215U
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron E3200 | Celeron 3215U |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron E3200 | Celeron 3215U |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron E3200 and Celeron 3215U
Celeron E3200
The Celeron E3200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,090 points. Launch price was $52.
Celeron 3215U
The Celeron 3215U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,091 points. Launch price was $107.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron E3200 and Celeron 3215U share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron E3200 versus 1.7 GHz on the Celeron 3215U — a 34.1% clock advantage for the Celeron E3200 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Celeron E3200 uses the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron 3215U uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron E3200 scores 1,090 against the Celeron 3215U's 1,091 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron 3215U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 340 vs 339, a 0.3% lead for the Celeron E3200 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron E3200 vs 2 MB on the Celeron 3215U.
| Feature | Celeron E3200 | Celeron 3215U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz+41% | 1.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+41% | 1.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (total)+100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 45 nm | 14 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Wolfdale (2008−2010) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 1,090 | 1,091 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 340 | 339 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 610 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron E3200 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron 3215U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Celeron E3200 versus DDR3L-1600 on the Celeron 3215U — the Celeron 3215U supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron E3200) vs 12 (Celeron 3215U) — the Celeron 3215U offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: G31,G41,P45 (Celeron E3200) and Wildcat Point-LP (Celeron 3215U).
| Feature | Celeron E3200 | Celeron 3215U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | FCBGA1168 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | DDR3L-1600+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 12 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron E3200) vs VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 3215U). The Celeron 3215U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Broadwell)), while the Celeron E3200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron E3200 targets Budget, Celeron 3215U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E3200 rivals Pentium E5200; Celeron 3215U rivals Pentium 3825U.
| Feature | Celeron E3200 | Celeron 3215U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics (Broadwell) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Budget | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron E3200 and Celeron 3215U
