Celeron E3200
VS
Pentium E5700

Celeron E3200 vs Pentium E5700

Intel

Celeron E3200

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Pentium E5700

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron E3200 is positioned at rank 683 and the Pentium E5700 is on rank 904, so the Celeron E3200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron E3200

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12296%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11619%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8436%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2541%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2013%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1761%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1009%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
996%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
906%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
906%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
896%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
872%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
860%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
856%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
849%
#683
Celeron E3200
MSRP: $43|Avg: $5
100%
#684
Core i5-3470
MSRP: $184|Avg: $55
100%
#685
Core i5-3450S
MSRP: $174|Avg: $20
100%
#686
Core i7-5820K
MSRP: $389|Avg: $103
100%
#687
Core i3-4330
MSRP: $138|Avg: $60
100%
#689
Core i7-7700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $75
98%
#690
Core i3-4150T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $30
98%
#691
Core i7-3770S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
97%
#692
Core i7-6800K
MSRP: $434|Avg: $120
97%
#693
Core i5-4670S
MSRP: $213|Avg: $30
97%
#694
Core i5-3550
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
97%
#695
Core i3-7300
MSRP: $184|Avg: $46
97%
#696
FX-4300
MSRP: $122|Avg: $25
97%
#697
Core i5-3450
MSRP: $184|Avg: $95
97%
#698
Celeron G550
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium E5700

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
21336%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
20160%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
14638%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4410%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3493%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3056%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1750%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1727%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1573%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1573%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1555%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1513%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1492%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1486%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1472%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
96%
#904
Pentium E5700
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
100%
#906
Athlon II X3 420e
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
100%
#907
Celeron E1500
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
99%
#909
Pentium G6950
MSRP: $87|Avg: $25
98%
#910
Pentium J4205
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
98%
#911
Core i3-2120
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
98%
#912
Pentium E6600
MSRP: $84|Avg: $50
97%
#913
Pentium E5500
MSRP: $75|Avg: $25
97%
#914
Pentium G3460
MSRP: $149|Avg: $25
97%
#915
Pentium E6700
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
97%
#916
Phenom II X4 820
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
96%
#917
Core i7-3930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $150
96%
#919
Core i7-4930K
MSRP: $670|Avg: $100
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Pentium E5700 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron E3200 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron E3200Pentium E5700
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($5)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Celeron E3200 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $5 (vs $15), it costs 67% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 198% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Pentium E5700.
InsightCeleron E3200Pentium E5700
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+198%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($5)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron E3200 and Pentium E5700

Intel

Celeron E3200

The Celeron E3200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,090 points. Launch price was $52.

Intel

Pentium E5700

The Pentium E5700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,096 points. Launch price was $110.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron E3200 and Pentium E5700 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron E3200 versus 3 GHz on the Pentium E5700 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Pentium E5700 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). Both are built on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture using a 45 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron E3200 scores 1,090 against the Pentium E5700's 1,096 — a 0.5% lead for the Pentium E5700. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureCeleron E3200Pentium E5700
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
3 GHz+25%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
3 GHz+25%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB (total)
2 MB (total)+100%
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark
1,090
1,096
Geekbench 6 Single
340
Geekbench 6 Multi
610
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA775 socket with PCIe 1.1.

FeatureCeleron E3200Pentium E5700
Socket
LGA775
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron E3200) / not specified (Pentium E5700). Primary use case: Celeron E3200 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E3200 rivals Pentium E5200.

FeatureCeleron E3200Pentium E5700
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron E3200 launched at $43 MSRP, while the Pentium E5700 debuted at $75. At current prices ($5 vs $15), the Celeron E3200 is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron E3200 delivers 218.0 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Pentium E5700 — making the Celeron E3200 the 99.6% better value option.

FeatureCeleron E3200Pentium E5700
MSRP
$43-43%
$75
Avg Price (30d)
$5-67%
$15
Performance per Dollar
218.0+198%
73.1
Release Date
2009
2010