Celeron E3200 vs Pentium E5700

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron E3200 vs Pentium E5700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron E3200 vs Pentium E5700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron E3200

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $32 less on MSRP ($43 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
✅Delivers 73.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.3 vs 14.6 PassMark/$ ($43 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,090 vs 1,096).

Pentium E5700

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.6 vs 25.3 PassMark/$ ($75 MSRP vs $43 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium E5700 better than Celeron E3200?

Yes. Pentium E5700 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium E5700 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium E5700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium E5700 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium E5700 comes in 74.4% more expensive on MSRP at $75 MSRP versus $43 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron E3200 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 73.5% better value on paper (25.3 vs 14.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium E5700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron E3200 vs Pentium E5700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron E3200

The Celeron E3200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,090 points. Launch price was $52.

Pentium E5700

The Pentium E5700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,096 points. Launch price was $110.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron E3200 and Pentium E5700 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron E3200 versus 3 GHz on the Pentium E5700 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Pentium E5700 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). Both are built on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture using a 45 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron E3200 scores 1,090 against the Pentium E5700's 1,096 — a 0.5% lead for the Pentium E5700. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron E3200	Pentium E5700
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	3 GHz+25%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)	2 MB (total)+100%
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Wolfdale (2008−2010)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,090	1,096
Geekbench 6 Single	340	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	610	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA775 socket with PCIe 1.1.

Feature	Celeron E3200	Pentium E5700
Socket	LGA775	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron E3200) / not specified (Pentium E5700). Primary use case: Celeron E3200 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E3200 rivals Pentium E5200.

Feature	Celeron E3200	Pentium E5700
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron E3200 was priced at $43, while the Pentium E5700 came in at $75. On launch pricing ($43 vs $75), Celeron E3200 was $32 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron E3200 delivers 25.3 pts/$ vs 14.6 pts/$ for the Pentium E5700 — making the Celeron E3200 the 53.7% better value option.

Feature	Celeron E3200	Pentium E5700
MSRP	$43-43%	$75
Performance per Dollar	25.3+73%	14.6
Release Date	2009	2010

Search Celeron E3200 on Amazon

Search Pentium E5700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.