PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron E3200 vs Celeron G1101 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron E3200 vs Celeron G1101: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron E3200

2009

Why buy it

✅+36% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $7 less on MSRP ($43 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
✅Delivers 16.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.3 vs 21.7 PassMark/$ ($43 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 73W, a 8W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1101 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G1101.

Celeron G1101

2010

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Westmere), while Celeron E3200 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Celeron E3200.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (250 vs 340).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (450 vs 610).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.7 vs 25.3 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $43 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron E3200 better than Celeron G1101?

Yes. Celeron E3200 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 35.6% better Geekbench multi-core, and 0.4% higher PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron E3200 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron E3200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 35.6% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron E3200 is the better buy right now. Celeron E3200 comes in $7 cheaper on MSRP at $43 MSRP versus $50 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 16.7% better value on MSRP (25.3 vs 21.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G1101 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron E3200 vs Celeron G1101 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron E3200

The Celeron E3200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,090 points. Launch price was $52.

Celeron G1101

The Celeron G1101 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,086 points. Launch price was $85.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron E3200 and Celeron G1101 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron E3200 versus 0.27 GHz on the Celeron G1101 — a 159.6% clock advantage for the Celeron E3200 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.26 GHz). The Celeron E3200 uses the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron G1101 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron E3200 scores 1,090 against the Celeron G1101's 1,086 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron E3200. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 340 vs 250, a 30.5% lead for the Celeron E3200 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 610 vs 450 (30.2% advantage for the Celeron E3200). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron E3200 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G1101.

Feature	Celeron E3200	Celeron G1101
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+789%	0.27 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+6%	2.26 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	45 nm	32 nm-29%
Architecture	Wolfdale (2008−2010)	Clarkdale (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,090	1,086
Geekbench 6 Single	340+36%	250
Geekbench 6 Multi	610+36%	450

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron E3200 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron G1101 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Celeron E3200 versus DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G1101 — the Celeron G1101 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G1101 supports up to 16.38 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 2.4% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron E3200) vs 16 (Celeron G1101) — the Celeron G1101 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: G31,G41,P45 (Celeron E3200) and H55,3420 (Celeron G1101).

Feature	Celeron E3200	Celeron G1101
Socket	LGA775	LGA1156
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	DDR3-1066+33%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16.38 GB+2%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Celeron G1101 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)), while the Celeron E3200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron E3200 targets Budget, Celeron G1101 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron E3200 rivals Pentium E5200; Celeron G1101 rivals Pentium G6950.

Feature	Celeron E3200	Celeron G1101
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron E3200 was priced at $43, while the Celeron G1101 came in at $50. On launch pricing ($43 vs $50), Celeron E3200 was $7 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron E3200 delivers 25.3 pts/$ vs 21.7 pts/$ for the Celeron G1101 — making the Celeron E3200 the 15.4% better value option.

Feature	Celeron E3200	Celeron G1101
MSRP	$43-14%	$50
Performance per Dollar	25.3+17%	21.7
Release Date	2009	2010

Search Celeron E3200 on Amazon

Search Celeron G1101 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.