
Celeron E3300

Ryzen 5 5600X
Celeron E3300 vs Ryzen 5 5600X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron E3300 vs Ryzen 5 5600X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron E3300 vs Ryzen 5 5600X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron E3300
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $249 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,155 vs 21,845).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.1 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +616.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 216.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 23.1 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌498% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than Celeron E3300?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron E3300 vs Ryzen 5 5600X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron E3300
The Celeron E3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,155 points. Launch price was $70.


Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Celeron E3300 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 5600X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron E3300 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 59.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Celeron E3300 uses the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron E3300 scores 1,155 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 179.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600X. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron E3300 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Celeron E3300 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 6 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 2.5 GHz | 4.6 GHz+84% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz+48% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (total) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 45 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-84% |
| Architecture | Wolfdale (2008−2010) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 1,155 | 21,845+1791% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 347 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 624 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron E3300 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Celeron E3300 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600X — the Ryzen 5 5600X supports 200.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 5600X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron E3300) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600X) — the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: G31,G41,P45 (Celeron E3300) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 5 5600X).
| Feature | Celeron E3300 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 4.0+264% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | DDR4-3200+200% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 128 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 5600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron E3300) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). Primary use case: Celeron E3300 targets Budget, Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron E3300 rivals Pentium E5200.
| Feature | Celeron E3300 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron E3300 was priced at $50, while the Ryzen 5 5600X came in at $299. On launch pricing ($50 vs $299), Celeron E3300 was $249 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron E3300 delivers 23.1 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600X — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 103.9% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron E3300 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-83% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.1 | 73.1+216% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














