PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron E3400 vs Celeron G470 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron E3400 vs Celeron G470: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron E3400

2010

Why buy it

✅+15.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Celeron G470.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,220 vs 1,225).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.0 vs 35.0 PassMark/$ ($53 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G470 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Celeron G470

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $18 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $53 MSRP).
✅Delivers 52.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 35.0 vs 23.0 PassMark/$ ($35 MSRP vs $53 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (300 vs 347).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron E3400.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G470 better than Celeron E3400?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron E3400 is ahead with a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G470 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G470 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G470 is the better buy right now. Celeron G470 comes in $18 cheaper on MSRP at $35 MSRP versus $53 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Celeron E3400 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 52.0% better value on MSRP (35.0 vs 23.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G470 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron E3400 vs Celeron G470 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron E3400

The Celeron E3400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,220 points. Launch price was $76.

Celeron G470

The Celeron G470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,225 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron E3400 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron G470 offers 1 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron E3400 has 1 more core. The Celeron E3400 is built on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron E3400 scores 1,220 against the Celeron G470's 1,225 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G470. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 347 vs 300, a 14.5% lead for the Celeron E3400 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron E3400 vs 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G470.

Feature	Celeron E3400	Celeron G470
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 2
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz	—
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+30%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)	—
Process	45 nm	32 nm-29%
Architecture	Wolfdale (2008−2010)	—
PassMark	1,220	1,225
Geekbench 6 Single	347+16%	300
Geekbench 6 Multi	624	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron E3400 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron G470 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 1066 memory speed. The Celeron G470 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron E3400) vs 16 (Celeron G470) — the Celeron G470 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: G31,G41,P35,P45 (Celeron E3400) and H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G470).

Feature	Celeron E3400	Celeron G470
Socket	LGA775	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	1066	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	32 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Celeron E3400) vs VT-x (Celeron G470). The Celeron G470 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Celeron E3400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron E3400 targets Budget, Celeron G470 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E3400 rivals Pentium E5200; Celeron G470 rivals Pentium G630.

Feature	Celeron E3400	Celeron G470
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron E3400 was priced at $53, while the Celeron G470 came in at $35. On launch pricing ($53 vs $35), Celeron G470 was $18 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron E3400 delivers 23.0 pts/$ vs 35.0 pts/$ for the Celeron G470 — making the Celeron G470 the 41.3% better value option.

Feature	Celeron E3400	Celeron G470
MSRP	$53	$35-34%
Performance per Dollar	23.0	35.0+52%
Release Date	2010	2013

Search Celeron E3400 on Amazon

Search Celeron G470 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.