Celeron E3400 vs Pentium Dual Core T4300

Intel

Celeron E3400

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Pentium Dual Core T4300

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2009

Celeron E3400 vs Pentium Dual Core T4300 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron E3400 vs Pentium Dual Core T4300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron E3400 vs Pentium Dual Core T4300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron E3400

2010

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $97 less on MSRP ($53 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 180.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.0 vs 8.2 PassMark/$ ($53 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • βœ…Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Pentium Dual Core T4300.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (1,220 vs 1,232).
  • ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Pentium Dual Core T4300

2009

Why buy it

  • βœ…+1% higher PassMark.
  • βœ…Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.2 vs 23.0 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $53 MSRP).
  • ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron E3400.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron E3400 better than Pentium Dual Core T4300?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron E3400 is ahead with a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Dual Core T4300 pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Dual Core T4300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron E3400 is the better buy right now. Celeron E3400 comes in $97 cheaper on MSRP at $53 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Pentium Dual Core T4300 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1% better PassMark. It is also 180.3% better value on MSRP (23.0 vs 8.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron E3400 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron E3400 vs Pentium Dual Core T4300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron E3400

The Celeron E3400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008βˆ’2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,220 points. Launch price was $76.

Intel

Pentium Dual Core T4300

The Pentium Dual Core T4300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000βˆ’2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,232 points. Launch price was $69.

⚑

Processing Power

Both the Celeron E3400 and Pentium Dual Core T4300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Celeron E3400 versus 2.1 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T4300 β€” a 21.3% clock advantage for the Celeron E3400 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Celeron E3400 uses the Wolfdale (2008βˆ’2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core T4300 uses NetBurst (2000βˆ’2006) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron E3400 scores 1,220 against the Pentium Dual Core T4300's 1,232 β€” a 1% lead for the Pentium Dual Core T4300. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureCeleron E3400Pentium Dual Core T4300
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz+24%
2.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz+24%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB (total)
1 MB
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Wolfdale (2008βˆ’2010)
NetBurst (2000βˆ’2006)
PassMark
1,220
1,232
Geekbench 6 Single
347
β€”
Geekbench 6 Multi
624
β€”
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron E3400 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium Dual Core T4300 uses P (PCIe 1.1) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Celeron E3400 versus DDR3-800 on the Pentium Dual Core T4300 β€” the Celeron E3400 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes.

FeatureCeleron E3400Pentium Dual Core T4300
Socket
LGA775
P
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
1066+33%
DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
0
0
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Celeron E3400) vs No VT-x (Pentium Dual Core T4300). Primary use case: Celeron E3400 targets Budget, Pentium Dual Core T4300 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron E3400 rivals Pentium E5200.

FeatureCeleron E3400Pentium Dual Core T4300
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
No VT-x
Target Use
Budget
Mobile
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron E3400 was priced at $53, while the Pentium Dual Core T4300 came in at $150. On launch pricing ($53 vs $150), Celeron E3400 was $97 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron E3400 delivers 23.0 pts/$ vs 8.2 pts/$ for the Pentium Dual Core T4300 β€” making the Celeron E3400 the 94.8% better value option.

FeatureCeleron E3400Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP
$53-65%
$150
Performance per Dollar
23.0+180%
8.2
Release Date
2010
2009

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.