Celeron E3400 vs Pentium E6700

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron E3400 vs Pentium E6700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron E3400 vs Pentium E6700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron E3400

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $33 less on MSRP ($53 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
✅Delivers 62.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.0 vs 14.2 PassMark/$ ($53 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Pentium E6700.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium E6700

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,219 vs 1,220).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.2 vs 23.0 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $53 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron E3400.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron E3400 better than Pentium E6700?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium E6700 is ahead with 23.1% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron E3400 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron E3400 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron E3400 is the better buy right now. Celeron E3400 comes in $33 cheaper on MSRP at $53 MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Pentium E6700 is still the better pure gaming CPU with 23.1% higher max boost clock. It is also 62.4% better value on MSRP (23.0 vs 14.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron E3400 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron E3400 vs Pentium E6700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron E3400

The Celeron E3400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,220 points. Launch price was $76.

Pentium E6700

The Pentium E6700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,219 points. Launch price was $80.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron E3400 and Pentium E6700 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Celeron E3400 versus 3.2 GHz on the Pentium E6700 — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Pentium E6700 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). Both are built on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture using a 45 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron E3400 scores 1,220 against the Pentium E6700's 1,219 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron E3400. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron E3400	Pentium E6700
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz	3.2 GHz+23%
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.2 GHz+23%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)	2 MB (total)+100%
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Wolfdale (2008−2010)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,220	1,219
Geekbench 6 Single	347	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	624	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA775 socket with PCIe 1.1. Both support up to 1066 memory speed. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Celeron E3400	Pentium E6700
Socket	LGA775	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	1066	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Celeron E3400) vs VT-x (Pentium E6700). Primary use case: Celeron E3400 targets Budget, Pentium E6700 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron E3400 rivals Pentium E5200.

Feature	Celeron E3400	Pentium E6700
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron E3400 was priced at $53, while the Pentium E6700 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($53 vs $86), Celeron E3400 was $33 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron E3400 delivers 23.0 pts/$ vs 14.2 pts/$ for the Pentium E6700 — making the Celeron E3400 the 47.6% better value option.

Feature	Celeron E3400	Pentium E6700
MSRP	$53-38%	$86
Performance per Dollar	23.0+62%	14.2
Release Date	2010	2010

Search Celeron E3400 on Amazon

Search Pentium E6700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.