Celeron G1840T
VS
Core 2 Duo SU9400

Celeron G1840T vs Core 2 Duo SU9400

Intel

Celeron G1840T

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo SU9400

2 Cores2 Thrd3 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G1840T is positioned at rank 525 and the Core 2 Duo SU9400 is on rank 409, so the Core 2 Duo SU9400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1840T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
8308%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7850%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5700%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1717%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1360%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1190%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
682%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
673%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
612%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
612%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
606%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
589%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
581%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
579%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
573%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
99%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
95%
#525
Celeron G1840T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
100%
#527
Pentium G4500
MSRP: $75|Avg: $34
99%
#528
Athlon X4 740
MSRP: $71|Avg: $71
99%
#529
Xeon E5-2608L v4
MSRP: $363|Avg: $174
99%
#531
Celeron G1610
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
98%
#532
Core i3-7100
MSRP: $117|Avg: $40
98%
#533
Celeron G1620T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $15
97%
#536
Pentium G4400T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $75
97%
#539
Athlon X4 850
MSRP: $77|Avg: $20
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo SU9400

#124
Core i5-1240P
MSRP: $309|Avg: $200
99%
#125
Core i7-13700H
MSRP: $502|Avg: N/A
98%
#397
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
552%
#398
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
543%
#399
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
499%
#400
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
497%
#401
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
492%
#403
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
475%
#404
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
456%
#405
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
455%
#406
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
443%
#409
Core 2 Duo SU9400
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#421
Core i5-9400H
MSRP: $182|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G1840T (2014) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron G1840TCore 2 Duo SU9400
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo SU9400 (2008) relies on 45 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron G1840TCore 2 Duo SU9400
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G1840T and Core 2 Duo SU9400

Intel

Celeron G1840T

The Celeron G1840T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,576 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core 2 Duo SU9400

The Core 2 Duo SU9400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,596 points. Launch price was $262.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G1840T and Core 2 Duo SU9400 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron G1840T versus 1.4 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SU9400 — a 56.4% clock advantage for the Celeron G1840T (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The Celeron G1840T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 2 Duo SU9400 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1840T scores 1,576 against the Core 2 Duo SU9400's 1,596 — a 1.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo SU9400. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Celeron G1840T vs 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo SU9400.

FeatureCeleron G1840TCore 2 Duo SU9400
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz+79%
1.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+79%
1.4 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
3 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
3 MB+1100%
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
1,576
1,596+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1840T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo SU9400 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron G1840TCore 2 Duo SU9400
Socket
LGA1150
BGA956
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G1840T) / not specified (Core 2 Duo SU9400). The Celeron G1840T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Core 2 Duo SU9400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1840T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1840T rivals Pentium G3240T.

FeatureCeleron G1840TCore 2 Duo SU9400
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget