Celeron G1840T vs Pro A6-8500B

Celeron G1840T vs Pro A6-8500B Performance Spectrum

Celeron G1840T

2 / 2

1,576

0.0%

1,592

+1.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1840T vs Pro A6-8500B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1840T vs Pro A6-8500B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1840T

2014

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Haswell), while Pro A6-8500B needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pro A6-8500B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,576 vs 1,592).
❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Pro A6-8500B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌5300% higher power demand at 54W vs 1W.

Pro A6-8500B

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 1W instead of 54W, a 53W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1840T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pro A6-8500B better than Celeron G1840T?

Yes. Pro A6-8500B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pro A6-8500B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pro A6-8500B is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pro A6-8500B is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pro A6-8500B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G1840T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (37.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pro A6-8500B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G1840T vs Pro A6-8500B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1840T

The Celeron G1840T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,576 points. Launch price was $69.

Pro A6-8500B

The Pro A6-8500B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,592 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G1840T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Pro A6-8500B's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron G1840T versus 3 GHz on the Pro A6-8500B — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Pro A6-8500B (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Celeron G1840T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Pro A6-8500B uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1840T scores 1,576 against the Pro A6-8500B's 1,592 — a 1% lead for the Pro A6-8500B.

Feature	Celeron G1840T	Pro A6-8500B
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz	3 GHz+20%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+56%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1024 kB+300%
Process	22 nm-21%	28 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	1,576	1,592+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1840T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pro A6-8500B uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G1840T	Pro A6-8500B
Socket	LGA1150	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G1840T) / not specified (Pro A6-8500B). The Celeron G1840T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Pro A6-8500B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1840T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1840T rivals Pentium G3240T.