Celeron G1840T vs Core i5-3339Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1840T vs Core i5-3339Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1840T vs Core i5-3339Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1840T

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 54W instead of 512W, a 458W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,576 vs 1,589).
❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Core i5-3339Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i5-3339Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌848.1% higher power demand at 512W vs 54W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1840T better than Core i5-3339Y?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G1840T is ahead with a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3339Y pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3339Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G1840T is the better buy right now. Celeron G1840T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $42 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i5-3339Y is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.8% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (37.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G1840T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G1840T vs Core i5-3339Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1840T

The Celeron G1840T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,576 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-3339Y

The Core i5-3339Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,589 points. Launch price was $250.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G1840T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-3339Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron G1840T versus 2 GHz on the Core i5-3339Y — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Celeron G1840T (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Celeron G1840T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-3339Y uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1840T scores 1,576 against the Core i5-3339Y's 1,589 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-3339Y. Both processors carry 3 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron G1840T	Core i5-3339Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz+25%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+67%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	1,576	1,589
Geekbench 6 Single	—	368
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	707

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1840T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-3339Y uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1840T versus 1600 on the Core i5-3339Y — the Core i5-3339Y supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1840T) and HM76,UM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i5-3339Y).

Feature	Celeron G1840T	Core i5-3339Y
Socket	LGA1150	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G1840T) vs true (Core i5-3339Y). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron G1840T) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3339Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1840T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1840T rivals Pentium G3240T; Core i5-3339Y rivals AMD A8-4555M.