Celeron G3900 vs Core 2 Duo T5850

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3900 vs Core 2 Duo T5850 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3900 vs Core 2 Duo T5850: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3900

2015

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 510, while Core 2 Duo T5850 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Core 2 Duo T5850.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,155 vs 2,161).
❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo T5850 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2450% higher power demand at 51W vs 2W.

Core 2 Duo T5850

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 51W, a 49W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3900 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G3900.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G3900 better than Core 2 Duo T5850?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G3900 is ahead with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T5850 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T5850 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G3900 is the better buy right now. Celeron G3900 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $42 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core 2 Duo T5850 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (51.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G3900 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G3900 vs Core 2 Duo T5850 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3900

The Celeron G3900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,155 points. Launch price was $42.

Core 2 Duo T5850

The Core 2 Duo T5850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,161 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G3900 and Core 2 Duo T5850 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G3900 versus 2.1 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5850 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Celeron G3900. The Celeron G3900 uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T5850 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3900 scores 2,155 against the Core 2 Duo T5850's 2,161 — a 0.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo T5850.

Feature	Celeron G3900	Core 2 Duo T5850
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+33%	2.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	—
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2 MB+700%
Process	14 nm-78%	65 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark	2,155	2,161
Geekbench 6 Single	680	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,250	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron G3900) / not specified (Core 2 Duo T5850). The Celeron G3900 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 510), while the Core 2 Duo T5850 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3900 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G3900 rivals Pentium G4400.