A10-5750M vs Celeron G3900

A10-5750M vs Celeron G3900 Performance Spectrum

A10-5750M

4 / 4

2,174

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G3900

2 / 2

2,155

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5750M vs Celeron G3900 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5750M vs Celeron G3900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5750M

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 51W, a 16W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (320 vs 680).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (707 vs 1,250).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G3900.

Celeron G3900

2015

Why buy it

✅+112.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike A10-5750M.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while A10-5750M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌45.7% higher power demand at 51W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G3900 better than A10-5750M?

Yes. Celeron G3900 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 76.8% better Geekbench multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G3900 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3900 is the stronger fit. You are getting 76.8% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G3900 is the better buy right now. Celeron G3900 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $42 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (51.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G3900 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-5750M vs Celeron G3900 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5750M

The A10-5750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,174 points. Launch price was $130.

Celeron G3900

The Celeron G3900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,155 points. Launch price was $42.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-5750M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G3900 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-5750M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A10-5750M versus 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G3900 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the A10-5750M (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The A10-5750M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G3900 uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5750M scores 2,174 against the Celeron G3900's 2,155 — a 0.9% lead for the A10-5750M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 320 vs 680, a 72% lead for the Celeron G3900 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 707 vs 1,250 (55.5% advantage for the Celeron G3900). L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-5750M vs 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G3900.

Feature	A10-5750M	Celeron G3900
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+25%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.8 GHz+12%
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	2,174	2,155
Geekbench 6 Single	320	680+113%
Geekbench 6 Multi	707	1,250+77%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5750M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G3900 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A10-5750M versus DDR4-2133 on the Celeron G3900 — the Celeron G3900 supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3900 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A76M (A10-5750M) and H110,B150,H170,Z170 (Celeron G3900).

Feature	A10-5750M	Celeron G3900
Socket	FS1r2	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	DDR4-2133+14%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	64 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-5750M) vs VT-x, VT-d (Celeron G3900). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8650G (A10-5750M) and Intel HD Graphics 510 (Celeron G3900) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-5750M targets Legacy Laptop, Celeron G3900 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A10-5750M rivals Core i3-3110M; Celeron G3900 rivals Pentium G4400.