Celeron G3900
VS
Core i5-4250U

Celeron G3900 vs Core i5-4250U

Intel

Celeron G3900

2 Cores2 Thrd51 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Core i5-4250U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G3900 is positioned at rank 419 and the Core i5-4250U is on rank 100, so the Core i5-4250U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3900

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6075%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5740%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4168%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1256%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
995%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
870%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
498%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
492%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
448%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
448%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
443%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
431%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
425%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
423%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
419%
#342
Core i3-9350K
MSRP: $184|Avg: $150
99%
#343
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
96%
#345
Core i9-9980XE
MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593
96%
#346
Core i7-10700K
MSRP: $387|Avg: $380
95%
#419
Celeron G3900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $39
100%
#420
Celeron G1840
MSRP: $35|Avg: $30
99%
#421
Core i5-8400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $95
99%
#423
Phenom II X3 705e
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $69
99%
#427
Core 2 Duo E8500
MSRP: $26|Avg: $26
97%
#429
Xeon E5-2618L v4
MSRP: $779|Avg: $33
97%
#434
Core i3-7320
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4250U

#88
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
274%
#89
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
270%
#90
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
248%
#91
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
246%
#92
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
244%
#94
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
236%
#95
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
226%
#96
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
226%
#97
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
220%
#100
Core i5-4250U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#102
N100
MSRP: $128|Avg: $128
100%
#106
Ryzen 5 2500U
MSRP: $349|Avg: N/A
98%
#109
Celeron 4305U
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
97%
#110
Celeron J1850
MSRP: $82|Avg: N/A
97%
#114
Core i3-4100M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $99
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-4250U leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron G3900 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron G3900Core i5-4250U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($39)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron G3900Core i5-4250U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($39)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G3900 and Core i5-4250U

Intel

Celeron G3900

The Celeron G3900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,155 points. Launch price was $42.

Intel

Core i5-4250U

The Core i5-4250U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,144 points. Launch price was $430.

Processing Power

The Celeron G3900 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-4250U's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G3900 versus 2.6 GHz on the Core i5-4250U — a 7.4% clock advantage for the Celeron G3900 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Celeron G3900 uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-4250U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3900 scores 2,155 against the Core i5-4250U's 2,144 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron G3900. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 680 vs 770, a 12.4% lead for the Core i5-4250U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,250 vs 1,450 (14.8% advantage for the Core i5-4250U). L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G3900 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-4250U.

FeatureCeleron G3900Core i5-4250U
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz+8%
2.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+115%
1.3 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)+33%
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Skylake (2015−2016)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
2,155
2,144
Geekbench 6 Single
680
770+13%
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,250
1,450+16%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3900 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4250U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Celeron G3900 versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-4250U — the Celeron G3900 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3900 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G3900) vs 12 (Core i5-4250U) — the Celeron G3900 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H110,B150,H170,Z170 (Celeron G3900) and Haswell-ULT (Core i5-4250U).

FeatureCeleron G3900Core i5-4250U
Socket
LGA1151
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133+33%
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+300%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+33%
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 510 (Celeron G3900) and HD Graphics 5000 (Core i5-4250U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3900 targets Desktop, Core i5-4250U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3900 rivals Pentium G4400; Core i5-4250U rivals Ryzen 3 3200U.

FeatureCeleron G3900Core i5-4250U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 510
HD Graphics 5000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop
Budget