
Celeron G3900

Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Celeron G3900 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G3900 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G3900 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G3900
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $407 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 51W instead of 120W, a 69W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,250 vs 15,000).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 51.3 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +441.5% higher average FPS across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 48.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 51.3 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌969% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$42 MSRP
- ❌135.3% higher power demand at 120W vs 51W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G3900.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than Celeron G3900?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G3900 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3900
The Celeron G3900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,155 points. Launch price was $42.


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The Celeron G3900 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G3900 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — a 56.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (base: 2.8 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Celeron G3900 uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3900 scores 2,155 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 — a 176.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 680 vs 2,700, a 119.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,250 vs 15,000 (169.2% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D). L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G3900 vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
| Feature | Celeron G3900 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 8 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | 5 GHz+79% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 4.4 GHz+57% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 96 MB (total)+2300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015−2016) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 2,155 | 34,293+1491% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 680 | 2,700+297% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,250 | 15,000+1100% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G3900 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Celeron G3900 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — the Ryzen 7 7800X3D supports 143.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G3900) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) — the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H110,B150,H170,Z170 (Celeron G3900) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D).
| Feature | Celeron G3900 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | DDR5-5200+144% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 28+75% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 7 7800X3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron G3900) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 510 (Celeron G3900) and AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3900 targets Desktop, Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Celeron G3900 rivals Pentium G4400; Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | Celeron G3900 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 510 | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G3900 was priced at $42, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D came in at $449. On launch pricing ($42 vs $449), Celeron G3900 was $407 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3900 delivers 51.3 pts/$ vs 76.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — making the Ryzen 7 7800X3D the 39.3% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G3900 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $42-91% | $449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.3 | 76.4+49% |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














