PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3900TE vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3900TE vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3900TE

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $154 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 510, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (903 vs 11,408).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.0 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +377.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+900% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Delivers 189.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 44.0 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
366.7% HIGHER MSRP
$196 MSRPvs$42 MSRP
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3900TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Celeron G3900TE?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 377.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1163.3% better Geekbench multi-core, 1252.9% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 377.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 1163.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 900% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in 366.7% more expensive on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 377.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 189.9% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 44.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2015), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151, 900% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 2/2. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron G3900TE vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3900TE

The Celeron G3900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,850 points. Launch price was $42.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G3900TE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Celeron G3900TE versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F. The Celeron G3900TE uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3900TE scores 1,850 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 172.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 514 vs 2,407, a 129.6% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 903 vs 11,408 (170.7% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G3900TE vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

Feature	Celeron G3900TE	Core i5-13400F
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	10 / 16+400%
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	4.6 GHz+100%
Base Clock	—	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	20 MB (total)+900%
L2 Cache	512 kB	1.25 MB (per core)+150%
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	1,850	25,029+1253%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,211
Geekbench 6 Single	514	2,407+368%
Geekbench 6 Multi	903	11,408+1163%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3900TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Celeron G3900TE versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 125% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G3900TE) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H110,Q170 (Celeron G3900TE) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).

Feature	Celeron G3900TE	Core i5-13400F
Socket	LGA1151	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+125%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	192 GB+200%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Celeron G3900TE includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 510), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3900TE targets Embedded, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Celeron G3900TE rivals Pentium G4400T; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Celeron G3900TE	Core i5-13400F
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 510	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Embedded	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G3900TE was priced at $42, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($42 vs $196), Celeron G3900TE was $154 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3900TE delivers 44.0 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 97.4% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G3900TE	Core i5-13400F
MSRP	$42-79%	$196
Performance per Dollar	44.0	127.7+190%
Release Date	2015	2023

Search Celeron G3900TE on Amazon

Search Core i5-13400F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.