Celeron G3900TE vs Pentium M 765

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3900TE vs Pentium M 765 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3900TE vs Pentium M 765: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3900TE

2015

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 510, while Pentium M 765 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Pentium M 765 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 35W vs 21W.

Pentium M 765

2004

Why buy it

✅Draws 21W instead of 35W, a 14W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,834 vs 1,850).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3900TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G3900TE better than Pentium M 765?

Yes. Celeron G3900TE is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G3900TE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3900TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G3900TE is the better buy right now. Celeron G3900TE comes in at an unclear MSRP at $42 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (44.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G3900TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2004) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G3900TE vs Pentium M 765 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3900TE

The Celeron G3900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,850 points. Launch price was $42.

Pentium M 765

The Pentium M 765 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,834 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G3900TE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium M 765 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron G3900TE has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Celeron G3900TE versus 2.1 GHz on the Pentium M 765 — a 9.1% clock advantage for the Celeron G3900TE. The Celeron G3900TE uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium M 765 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3900TE scores 1,850 against the Pentium M 765's 1,834 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron G3900TE. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G3900TE vs 0 kB on the Pentium M 765.

Feature	Celeron G3900TE	Pentium M 765
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz+10%	2.1 GHz
Base Clock	—	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	2 MB+300%
Process	14 nm-84%	90 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	1,850	1,834
Geekbench 6 Single	514	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	903	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3900TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium M 765 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Celeron G3900TE versus DDR2-533 on the Pentium M 765 — the Celeron G3900TE supports 300.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3900TE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H110,Q170 (Celeron G3900TE) and 915GM,945GT (Pentium M 765).

Feature	Celeron G3900TE	Pentium M 765
Socket	LGA1151	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133+300%	DDR2-533
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+1500%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron G3900TE) vs false (Pentium M 765). The Celeron G3900TE includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 510), while the Pentium M 765 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3900TE targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Celeron G3900TE rivals Pentium G4400T.