Celeron G4930 vs Celeron M P4500

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G4930 vs Celeron M P4500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G4930 vs Celeron M P4500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G4930

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 54W instead of 512W, a 458W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Celeron M P4500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Celeron M P4500 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Celeron M P4500

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron G4930 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,533 vs 2,551).
❌848.1% higher power demand at 512W vs 54W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G4930 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G4930 better than Celeron M P4500?

Yes. Celeron G4930 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G4930 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G4930 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G4930 is the better buy right now. Celeron G4930 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $42 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (60.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G4930 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G4930 vs Celeron M P4500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4930

The Celeron G4930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,551 points. Launch price was $42.

Celeron M P4500

The Celeron M P4500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,533 points. Launch price was $86.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G4930 and Celeron M P4500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Celeron G4930 versus 1.86 GHz on the Celeron M P4500 — a 53% clock advantage for the Celeron G4930. The Celeron G4930 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron M P4500 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4930 scores 2,551 against the Celeron M P4500's 2,533 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron G4930. Both processors carry 2 MB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron G4930	Celeron M P4500
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+72%	1.86 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	2,551	2,533
Geekbench 6 Single	672	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,229	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4930 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron M P4500 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G4930	Celeron M P4500
Socket	LGA1151	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G4930) / not specified (Celeron M P4500). The Celeron G4930 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Celeron M P4500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4930 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4930 rivals Pentium G5420.